Hawaiian Connection


Those curious about the obscure side-notes of history may find it interesting that Queen Victoria was a great friend to the royal family of Hawaii in the nineteenth century, in particular the dowager Queen Emma. I have been living in Honolulu this past year, and the wealth of artifacts and information connecting the two royal families here is dazzling. Queen Emma and Kamehameha IV of Hawaii so idolized the British royal family that they asked Victoria to be godmother to their only son and named him after Prince Albert. Victoria graciously accepted and sent him a silver christening cup, only to find out that the toddler prince had died. only months later, Victoria received a letter from Emma that Kamehameha IV, in his grief, had followed their son to the grave. Victoria had herself become a distraught widow only a couple of years prior, and hastened to send letters offering solace to Emma, whose grief she understood only too well. The two women kept up a correspondence until Emma's death in the 1880s, and Emma had the pleasure of meeting her beloved friend and mentor on a state visit in 1865. Victoria invited her to stay with the royal family at Windsor Castle, and helped her raise $30,000 for the building of a new cathedral in Hawaii. Victoria was somberly gratified to see that Emma, like herself, wore the perpetual widows weeds. Both women had married in love matches, both had been widowed tragically early (Emma when she was only in her twenties), and both remained in deepest mourning until their deaths.

If you go to Queen Emma's summer palace (a lovely, modest building with a broad, breezy veranda nestled peacefully at the foot of picturesque, rainy mountains) you can see such treasures as a locket containing Queen Victoria's hair, jewelry and priceless European furniture given to Emma by Victoria and Albert, a painted portrait of the Queen hanging in Emma's private bedchamber, and two beautiful etchings of Victoria and Albert proudly displayed among the Hawaiian royal portraits. The lock of hair especially was an unexpected revelation that was as thrilling to stumble upon as anything I saw in the great museums of England and France.

Furthermore, if you go to the Iolani Palace in downtown Honolulu, you can find portraits of Hawaiian monarchs painted by British master and and Royal Academy member John Hayter (brother to a court painter of Queen Victoria), and a fantastic original Winterhalter of Victoria and Albert's dear friend King Louis Philippe of the French, which Louis sent to the royal Hawaiians. There are also photographs and jewels worn by Queen Kapiolani and Lili'uokalani when they attended Victoria's diamond Jubilee. Also, the Bishop Museum in Honolulu contains a teapot presented by Lord Byron to the gorgeous Hawaiian Queen Victoria Kamamalu who created a sensation at the British court in 1824 on a state visit.

The British Monarchy, along with most European heads of state, was shocked and appalled in 1893 when the USA illegally annexed the Hawaiian Islands, declaring the benevolent and popular constitutional monarchy of Hawaii a tyrannical despotism, and imprisoning Queen Lili'uokalini. I was even told by a European coworker recently that in some countries, Hawaii is still officially recognized as a sovereign kingdom. I don't know if that's true or not, but the thought alone is interesting.

Interestingly, the Hawaii state flag is the only flag in the USA to contain the flag of another nation (the British flag) in honor of Hawaii's friendship with the British. And on a superficially related note, Queen Emma was the first person of color to attend a White House state dinner, and King Kalakaua was the first foreign head of state (and the first reigning monarch) to attend a White House state dinner.

reply

For those interested, here's a link on some letters and information on the friendship between Queen Emma and Queen Victoria.

http://evols.library.manoa.hawaii.edu/bitstream/handle/10524/202/JL221 11.pdf?sequence=2

reply

I knew a bit about their friendship, but this was very interesting.

Thank you.

reply

I'm glad you found it so. I hoped somebody would find it interesting.

reply

Interesting, considering how bigoted the British monarchy was at that time.

reply

Bigoted in which way?

reply

There is always an element of bigotry inherent in imperialism, but I don't think the British were worse than most (The Belgian Congo for example), and I don't think Victoria or Albert were personally bigoted. In either case, Europeans, particularly the British, were remarkably non-bigotted toward the impeccably educated, very modern, and very civilized Hawaiian monarchy. Americans, on the other hand, particularly New Englanders, were extremely bigoted. Even today there is a sense of warmness in Hawaii toward the British.

reply

How many know that Victoria's grandma on her paternal side, Queen Charlotte was part black?

reply

Oi, this story shows how hard it can be to debunk something once it has made the rounds on the modern information superhighway.

This story was propagated by someone calling himself Mario de Valdes y Cocom. Good luck trying to track this guy because he has disappeared back under whatever rock he crawled out from. Sadly, his nonsense got some real publicity from PBS's Frontline. http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline/shows/secret/famous/royalfamily.html

The portraits showing Queen Charlotte's supposedly prominent "negroid" features were all done by Sir Allan Ramsay, who was a big anti-slavery proponent. His portraits are propaganda, pure and simple.

But serious genealogists have addressed this. The best summary of what's real versus what's bunk is here: http://archiver.rootsweb.ancestry.com/th/read/GEN-MEDIEVAL/2004-09/1096208509

Leo van de Pas is the go-to guy on medieval genealogy. As a genealogist myself, and one who studies the royal families of Europe, if he says it is so, I'd bet every cent I have on it.

Bottom line, unless you come from a different planet, we all are a mixture of genes anyway. But this particular story holds more hot air than water.

reply

The first time I visited Hawai'i in 1965, besides the beauty of the Islands, I was particulary struck by the palpable, blatant racism and prejudice. It spoiled much of the trip. Twenty years later, on my next visit, I didn't observe so much of it and was glad to see that it had abated to a certain extent.

Imperialism and colonialism are always justified by the myth that Europeans and Americans of European descent are innately superior to anyone of a different "race". In fact, they invented the scientifically specious concept of "race" in order to pillage and plunder the Americas, Oceania, India, Australia & New Zealand, Africa, Indo-China, etc. The effects of this have been devastating resulting in de-culturation, genocide, etc. The British and the USA to name only a couple of the Imperialists, have been a cancer everywhere that they forced themselves onto other people and cultures.



_______________________________________
"ARE YOU NOT ENTERTAINED??!!"

Maximus Decimus Meridius

reply

I'm not sure exactly what your point is. As in all miscegenation cultures, all diverse populations, and all places defined by a past of imperialism, Hawaii certainly has its share of prejudice. I understand in the '60s and before it was indeed very bad. We evan had our own "Scottsboro Boys" incident back in the '30s, in which a white girl accused a group of Asian-Americans and "locals" of rape, one of whom was consequently brutally murdered by vigilantes. Generally I find the climate very friendly here when it comes to day-to-day interaction, though.

Queen Victoria was a woman of her time, certainly, but for a woman of her time she would not have been considered a bigot. Quite the contrary. In 1843, following the unsanctioned seizure of the Islands by a British warship, Queen Victoria spearheaded a proclamation that declared that she personally, and the British and French nations recognized Hawaii as an independent nation, and would make no future attempt to colonize Hawaii (Notably, the USA declined to participate). Hawaii was the first ethnically non-European nation to be included in the family of nations. Victoria was godmother to a Hawaiian prince, namesake of at least two Hawaiian princesses, counted two Hawaiian queens among the the most honored guests at her golden jubilee, and put up another Hawaiian queen as a private guest in Windsor Castle. This is not to say she would have arranged a marriage between one of her daughters and a Hawaiian prince, but through the eyes of 1843 she wasn't a racist.

Anglophilia is very palpable among anyone with a sense of the history here, whether it's looking up at the state flag and seeing the Union Jack next to stripes representing the major islands, driving past Honolulu's Episcopalian cathedral or going to any number of the palaces and museums here and seeing portraits of Victoria and Albert hanging. The friendship and mutual respect of Hawaii and the British (which was a personal as well as political relationship) is honored. Queen Victoria may have been the most personally invested and instrumental British figure in forging and maintaining this friendship, which is why I thought to post the original post here.

Do you agree with this? Disagree with this? I'm not sure exactly where you're coming from in the context of the original post.

Imperialism and colonialism are always justified by the myth that Europeans and Americans of European descent are innately superior to anyone of a different "race".


How do you feel about Asian, Islamic and African Imperialism? Or pre-Colombian Imperialism among the indigenous peoples of the Americas, for that matter.

Anyway, I hadn't intended this thread to be very political or racial...just to honor and raise a little awareness for a couple of forgotten pages of history. But all interpretation and points of view are welcome.

reply