Nonsense; people just base their ideas of what makes a tyrant on larger than life Sci-Fi concepts that have no basis in reality. Ming was every bit the dastardly swine that Vader was, with the exception that he didn't have an unlimited number of guards to murder for minor failings, or the ability to destroy planets with a big laser weapon. Surely you should judge him on whether he would do such a thing, rather than whether he had the capability, which he most certainly would, but only IF it would get him what he wanted.
And unlike Darth Vader, Ming's backstory didn't suck. Like he said, he earned his title through bloodshed; the man was a soldier, someone who had to claw and fight his way to the top. And let's not forget that Hitler was a soldier, and is a damn sight more popular when citing evil dictators than Vader. And, if we're going to use Vader as a measuring stick, we should point out that he was a) just Emperor Palpatine's bitch from beginning to end, and b) not beyond redemption. Ming was never going to concede that he'd been wrong, even if Aura had been in trouble; Vader openly did when he saw Luke being zapped.
Also, you're confusing popularity with good writing. Vader was never well-written, he was just a fan favourite.
-
"I am the scourge of God, appointed to chastise thee."
reply
share