I have a Quad Core 2.66
4gb of ram and a Nvidia GeForce 9800 GT2. I still cant run the game wll on max settings..wtf...?
I'm the guy who makes the "worst movie ever" thread in your favorite movie board
That rig can run very high easily. Get new drivers, reinstall everything. An 8800 Ultra and a Core 2 DUO E8200 @ 2.66 ghz can run very high at 30-40 FPS.
shareI'm running XP Pro 32 bit, AMD 6400+ dual core, 2GB PC6400, 2 9800 GTX in SLI at 738core/2250memory clock settings and a X-Fi Extreme Audio sound card on an ASUS M2N32-SLI Deluxe Wireless board, which is not OC'd at all. I have it at the "high" settings for the graphics and have not had any problems at all with it.
A L C _ H _ L - Sometimes alcohol is the answer
Me too i have a quad core 4 g of ram and a ATI Radeon HD 4870 still can't run it on very high. is good enough though on high.
"I'm a Hero Hunter, I hunt Heroes. Haven't found any yet."
[deleted]
I bet your motherboard could support up to 8gig of DDR2 RAM. That would be the cheapest and most obvious upgrade you could do. If you want to play on the higher settings you may have to:
a) consider playing on DX9 mode instead, on the higher settings it looks almost exactly the same as DX10
b) turn off AA or shading. These are the biggest culprits when it comes to lowering your FPS.
3GB of Ram isnt good. You must have either 2 or 4 to work in dual channel.
shareI have an Athlon 64 X2 6000+ 3.0 ghz, 2 GB of RAM and a Radeon HD 4850 512 MB, and runs it fine at 1680x1050 all at high settings, but no AA :) Your computer should get to run it just fine. If you mean the Very High settings in Crysis, you can't enable that unless you are running Crysis on Vista with DX10.
shareE8400 @ 3.6 ghz (1600 mhz FSB), 4 x 1 GB Crucial Ballistix PC2 6400 RAM @ 960 mhz, (EVGA) NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 CORE 216 @ 684/1476/1190, here is a benchmark.
Run #1- DX10 1680x1050 AA=No AA, 64 bit test, Quality: High ~~ Minimum FPS: 33.44 Maximum FPS: 66.31 Last Average FPS: 46.30
[deleted]