MovieChat Forums > The New Daughter (2010) Discussion > Probably the worst ending to a film ever

Probably the worst ending to a film ever


I don't think i've ever been more unsatisfied

reply

I agree in the sense that i thought they could do alot more with the ending but i did like the haunting reflection idea

Do guys like "the thing"?
They like it better than no thing.

reply

ever




um





yer in some pretty rare air there







ever

so so so many many mooovie
don't know how 2 end
but this was just a
lead in 2 part 2


so um ever?
no
not even top 50
ever

1 of us needs 2 c mo mooooooovie








Ja, ja, ja, so, no rilly - wait, what?

reply

[deleted]

What an annoying, obnoxious way to post a comment. Douche bag

reply

I hated this movie right from the start and have no idea why I watched it to the end. Those things were more believable as trolls than old Indian gods. Costner was an idiot 99% of the movie and in denial. He should have left with his son when his son begged him to stay with him. What an *beep*

reply

Problem was that he had promised his daughter he would never leave her.

reply

Oh oh oh! Thank you! I can't remember the name of the movie now, but there's another movie where a mother and daughter move into the delapadated (sp?) building after her divorce. OK, so throughout the movie, weird things are happening in the building, as well as to the little girl. By the end, it's revealed that there's a ghost girl who is plaguing the mother and daughter. Mostly the daughter, because the ghost is jealous of the little girl. She (the ghost) was abandoned in the building (specifically, the apartment above the one where the mother and daughter are currently living), and the girl wandered up to the roof, where a water tank was, and she climbed up a ladder on the tank, and wound up falling in and drowning. So once it's discovered what happened to the little girl, the mother thinks everything is over, and her own daughter is safe, and they can go on with their lives. But it's not. While the daughter is taking a bath, the ghost comes back and starts trying to kill the daughter by drowning her in the tub. The mother fights to save her daughter, so she promises the ghost she'll stay and never leave the ghost girl. "Magically," the mother takes her daughter's place and drowns. Thereby fulfilling her promise that she'll stay with the ghost girl.

So, anyway, the point is, in this movie, The New Daughter, the father made a promise not to ever leave his daughter. The only way to keep the promise, like with the other movie, was for the father to die. In this case, for the daughter to die as well. It was the only way that he could protect his daughter from the Mound Walkers.

As to the absolute end of this movie being "the worst ending to a film, ever," well, it certainly could have been better, but it's certainly not the worst ending, ever.

reply

Dark Water

We live by the Sun, we feel by the Moon

reply

What is wrong with the ending?





~~ If you want a happy ending, that depends, of course, on where you stop your story ~ Orson Welles

reply

For a film that seemed to be anything but ambiguous when it came to its plot leading up to the final scene, there's a few things wrong with it.

reply

TheMonkofDestiny^

Care to elaborate?





~~ The good ended happily, and the bad unhappily. That is what fiction means ~ ~ Oscar Wilde

reply

What was wrong with it?

He goes all the way into the mound to save his daughter. He gets her out, kills a few monsters quite easily on the way. When they're finally out, there seems to be a single guard monster growling and hissing. His daughter utters "don't leave me daddy" or something along those lines. So what does he do? He blows himself and his daughter up with some ANFO.

1. He goes all the way crawling inside the mound but commits suicide outside because of one gnarly monster? Are you kidding me?

2. He doesn't want to leave his daughter but he doesn't mind leaving his son, it seems (who's going to be savagely murdered by monsters from what we've seen; but let's pretend he doesn't know that because he thinks he's still in the house).

3. What happened to his shotgun? Don't tell me he didn't take any extra ammo?

4. There was also the bulldozer next to them (but let's pretend he doesn't have the keys).


But! he may have survived because we vaguely see a shadow in the reflection of the frame Sam is holding. That didn't look possible when we see him casually drop the flare in the explosive mixture, his daughter lying a couple of feet away. There is NO WAY either of them could have survived seeing how that scene was shot. They were just too close and still.

So that's what was wrong with the movie. It gives you a sense Kevin Costner's character is in control until suddenly, for no valid reason, he decides it's better to go up in smoke with his daughter.

__________________________
www.1up-games.com Last seen:

reply

Did you all not see how the daughter started to change into one of those monsters? I just now finished watching the movie. I had watched it the first time a year or so ago and just watched it again and at the end, after he comes out of the hole with his daughter and then they see the monster standing there, the daughter says "don't leave me daddy" but all of a sudden right after she says it, her face is clearly turning into a creature sort of thing and the dad knows that it's too late. She's already become one of them. That's when he decides to drop the torch and set everything on fire. He knew he had to kill the monster and also his daughter since she'd already started turning into one of them and I guess he just couldn't bear to kill her and remain alive to have to live with himself after doing what he had to do. He figured his son was safe in the house and that he could go back and live with his mother and that he'd just rather die than live knowing that he had to kill his own daughter, even though he really had no choice. If anyone doubts that she starts turning into a monster right after she says "don't leave me daddy", please try to watch it again and make sure to pay attention to her face right after she says that because the camera is on her face and it clearly shows that's what happening but if you look away for a few seconds you will indeed miss it. So it wasn't just a matter of the dad killing himself for no reason.

reply

Totally right DEB! Guess nobody noticed that, but I did. And, you cannot blink or you will miss it.

Remember when daughter earlier asked why Mom left us, then said to Dad "you will too, won't you"? Dad said, "I will NEVER leave you". Then at the end, she says "don't leave me Daddy" and of course, remembering his promise earlier, he chooses to die with her rather than leave her.

I was happy with the ending because it was not the usual "all's well that ends well". Surprise!

reply

I agree. I thought it was a good movie with a lame ending. I hate these sudden endings, especially where you're not sure who exactly survived and why. Could have been so much better.

reply

Unsatisfied? The ending of a movie is not supposed to be satisfying. I was very pleasantly surprised by the ending, you don't see that in many Hollywood movies these days. I thought that the beginning was kind of slow paced but the second half of the movie and especially the ending made this actually a good movie.

reply

I just think the director was trying to be clever. He mentioned that he wanted us to guess the ending. Well it is his movie what did he want the ending to be like? Stand by your product and give us a full movie. I hate that.

I don't mind trying to figure out things but heck this is a movie not a some sort of lab in school or algebra class. I want to be entertained.

It wasn't the worst ending. But it goes into the category that all of these movies going into. A waste of two hours you will never get back and another waste of time if you actually fell for what the lazy clever director wanted us to do, give him a ending to his own movie. Oh and I have only myself to blame. As soon as I saw her tub scene with the mud and the blood with no explanation I knew the ending was going to be like that too.
And this is another one of those movies where the father is way too old to have 7 year old children. God the ego of these actors is something else.

reply

So, Costner's what, early 50's in this movie? Let's say he's 54 years old. That's not too old to be the father of a 7 yr old! Heck, my husband was 44 when we had our younger son.

reply

Honestly, I think that's a myth that horror/film fans perpetuate. The vast majority of modern horror films have bleak, depressing, "the bad guy wins" or "everybody dies" type of endings. If anything, having an ending like the original Gremlins, or Poltergeist, or The Gate, where people go through a terrifying ordeal but the main characters DON'T die, that is rare, and sadly almost novel these days.

Personally, I don't watch supernatural horror films to see bleak, hopefully, "let's be as fucked up as possible" shit. If I want that, I can find it in the news in real life, like every single day. Personally, I like to be entertained, not to watch the writer/director masturbate over how clever they think their "I made a bleak ending just like everyone else" is.

reply

***Spoiler***Yes, it was not well shot. You don't really know what the monster is doing at the very end with the daughter or the father.

reply

According to the writer/producer, (in an interview) the ending was left "ambiguous" so that the viewers can make-up their own ending.
But like you, it just left a bad taste in my mouth.

PS: OR maybe they left the end "ambiguous" so that they can make a PART TWO later on. (??)

In Hollywood they just LOVE to make many sequels,even if the movie is not too great.

👧
DREAMS-AGAIN
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

reply

Calling the ending "ambiguous" is just an excuse for bad filmmaking.

__________________________
www.1up-games.com Last seen:

reply

It was a lame movie, but decent insomniac entertainment. Costner's character acted more like a scared child than an adult most of the time. Odd casting I suppose.

Deborah1005 nailed the ending and the metamorphosis of the daughter. However, Dad's act left Junior (equally as chicken-bleep as the old man) at risk of many things, including the last backgroundy mud critter.

Even if Dad was able to detonate the bomb, kill the mud things and rescue the son, he still would have likely been thrown in the slammer for multiple murders; or a mental institution for batshytecraziness. I'm assuming the last mud critter would have carted away the carcasses of the previously killed mud critters in or around the house in typically frustrating movie fashion leaving no real evidence they actually existed.

Just a mess of a plot. Bad casting - the girl was TV-kid-obnoxious and her final scene was pure justice.

reply

It's a grim ending, but I thought it was haunting and well done.

reply