MovieChat Forums > Gomorra (2009) Discussion > Shooting in their undies?

Shooting in their undies?


Why did the blokes strip down to their underwear when they did the ahooting? It was also on the poster and DVD cover. Is the choice of clothing ( or the lack of it ) supposed to symbolise something?

reply

Just watched this the other day for the first time and had those same thoughts. The only thing that I could think of is that they didn't want to get their clothes wet? Either that or the director choice de-clothe the actors was to symbolize some sort of sense of freedom... Just a couple wild guesses.

reply

I took at it as the washed off in the river. Before they stole the guns they were in, what looked like to be, a makeshift stable with a bunch of cows? Regardless of the animal the entire floor was filled with animal excrements which they probably got on them and their clothes.

Just my take on the scene

Don't believe everything you think

reply

great observation/expanation
i too wondered 'w t f'

reply

Sounds overly practical and therefore kind of pointless.

reply

I thought it was supposed to have an 'emperor has no clothes' suggestion to it. An illustration of their overconfidence. From the start these guys have these huge Tony Montana egos and expectations when in reality, the way we see them, they're the lowest form of life, more trouble to kill than they're worth.

This is emphasized on the forementioned cover art. He's a dumb kid in his underwear, but when he has that gun, he thinks he's a giant over Italy.

reply

I would go with what booger says

reply

They dont have Tony Montana egos. They are kids, they are experimenting. They want to be tough guy mafiosos, they would like to develop into that.

reply

At least there is one Tony Montana reference in the scene where the two kids are playing with guns in the abandoned villa.
The filming location is the villa built for boss Walter Schiavone in Casal di Principe on the model of Montana's villa in 'Scarface'.
You can see it here : https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=n4yeRU-qHsg

reply

I don't think that it had any special meaning. They took their clothes off simply because they were wading in water and probably swimming in it afterwards. Actually, I would have found it more inappropriate and strange if they had had their clothes on in that scene.

reply

I agree with the other poster who said it represents or illustrates some sort of freedom. These were poor, insecure boys with low self-esteem that hit puberty. Having those guns all in a sudden allowed them to shed off their insecurities and gave them an (albeit false) sense of confidence, power and freedom. Which is nicely illustrated in this scene at the riverside where they expose themselves (to a decent extent; they're still wearing undies) and vent their angst and frustrations (by letting the guns rattle). It's like a way of shouting "we're not afraid of the world".

Moreover, it was a sort of beach; I figure it wouldn't be weird to see people take off their clothes in order to recreate there in underwear or swimming shorts.

~ Everyone is unique, except for me ~

reply

LOL When I watched that scene, my first thought was a) they were just at a cattle holding area and had crap up to their knees and wanted to wash those clothes off in the water. You can actually see the cattle poo on their pants in those scenes, and b) they were high off of getting the guns, were excited and decided to take a dip in the ocean.

If you are familiar with that specific culture then you will know that getting stripped down is nothing odd and that taking a dip as a way to waste the day away is common.

reply

Lol, i thought you were going to say getting crap on your pants was common in italian culture....

reply

Heh, :)

reply

I think they took off their clothes so that viewer could see their bodies. They were skinny kids, very young and innocent not strong and macho but they felt that getting into business with mafia was their way for better life. They were living in a ghetto, coolest guys in that place were those who were with the mafia, if you ever wanted to make something of yourself mafia was the way to go. What else is there. What was their father doing for a job, did we even see the father or was it just single mother. What kind of manly role models did those kids have, maybe just the mafia.

reply

they were probably cooked in the usual 35C humid weather...?--it effectively added to the weirdness of the scene. i like the films' "roughness": the characters are frighteningly real and don't seem scripted, and the film's style has the effect of someone with a hidden camera moving through the story. very artistic "neighbourhood" design and council flats -- too bad it's a war zone.

reply

I don't think the scene means anything nor is it symbolic for anything.
I think most of you simply over-analyse things.

Not every scene means something. Maybe they throw their clothes becasue they were dirty, which they were? Maybe they just wanted to wash them?

reply

Not to call down a lot of misplaced homophobic reaction, but the simplest explanation might be from the title itself.
"Gomorra' isn't just a place in the Bible notorious for its sinfulness (thus the wordplay with Camorra), it's specifically male-on-male sinfulness. And, face it, the film opens with an over the top homoerotic scene of a bunch of mob guys clowning in a very claustrophobic spa, then getting massacred. The theme of men, and men only, acting out their power fantasies in various ways persists throughout the movie.

The two 'Scarface'-obsessed bozos don't have girlfriends, just each other. The Camorro made guys don't interact with women at all. In the street scenes Toto and his friends move in parallel with the neighborhood girls, but don't actually connect with them. And so on. The women portrayed, and probably the women of Naples in fact, just live unhappily in a social order set up and enforced for the benefit of the brutal (and in casting terms, interchangeable) bulls on top.

I think part of what viewers who hated the movie were unconsciously reacting to is the surpassing ugliness of all the locations. There are actually beautiful places in and around Naples, but you'd hardly know it from watching 'Gomorra,' except maybe that incredible stone quarry (and the mob guys fill it up with toxic sludge!). Even the bosses, with their
pockets full of cash, inhabit horrible, dim, falling apart slums, as if any idea of beauty, or even simple visual relief, could not be allowed in their world. Even the beaches looked bad. None of the clean, sunlit glamour of Miami in Napoli. In the Venice boat scene, Roberto looking around at the Grand Canal can't believer his eyes, and talks like he's never heard of such a place.

Speaking of ugly, how about that dress? Woof. And badly sewn, too. The filmmakers didn't pay any attention to the realities of the fashion business at all. Can you imagine a Scarlett Johansen actually willing to wear that to a movie opening? I wonder how they got her to wear it for a twelve second bit of the movie.

reply

It's a gay bar/skinny jeans reference! Now I'm having fun here, bhahahaha

Uh baby U 4got to pull out. 9 months later, can U pull this ucking baby outta me, do that @ least!

reply