What was the point of Hermione's torture scene?
Why bother having Bellatrix engrave mudblood on her arm if no one brings it up again?
shareWhy bother having Bellatrix engrave mudblood on her arm if no one brings it up again?
shareIt was in the book and it was just showing what a sadist she is. What was your issue with it?
shareThe issue is that I liked how it was better in the book. In the book, it was the cruciatus curse and Ron was crying for her. In the movie, it looks like he could care less. And all Bellatrix did was go on top of her. Hermione could have tried to get up.
shareI highly doubt there was much she could have done, but I won't argue that the books were better. You almost have to read the books or else the movies don't make any sense.
shareIn the movies, Hermione could have tried to fight back and get Bellatrix off her. Just because they're evil doesn't mean they're all powerful.
shareBellatrix had no problem using the cruciartis (I know I misspelled that) curse.
sharecuz its torture is a pleasure for Psychos See Ramsay Bolton with Theon Greyjoy
shareThey needed to show how evil Bellatrix was
shareI understand that, but the movie did a horrible job of that. She writes "mudblood" in little letters and Hermione could have easily have done a spell against Bellatrix. It shouldn't have mattered if she was on top of her. And then Harry and Ron don't even acknowledge what happened.
share