The intent of the film is that he is not faking the blindness. Whether you think the film maker has accurately portrayed this is another matter. But he is shown acting blind when he is alone, reading Braille, etc. And there's no motivation given for faking it. I would say that a theme of the movie is that he also became psychologically blind, and at the end starts a recovery from that, even though he is still visually blind.
Cortical blindness (the diagnosis given by the doctor, at least as translated in the subtitles) is not necessarily total, as others have mentioned. It's certainly conceivable that he could pick up clues of lighting through the peephole, and that he could pick up the general sense of the lighting of a scene shown on the screen, especially when these are combined with other cues.
The part that's hard to believe is that cortical blindness due to trauma is a severe brain injury, and it's extremely rare to have the blindness with no other apparent brain injury. Mateo recovered mighty quickly from an auto accident in which he suffered such brain injury. (It's not clear exactly how long he was in the hospital, but his motel room had not been cleared out.) It's so rare that I found a case study published in 2006 in the Journal of the Medical Association of Thailand which says "the authors report the first case of cortical blindness without any neurological deficits in a patient with bilateral occipital lobe hemorrhage after a motorcycle accident". Since Mateo does not appear to have any other neurological deficits, he's in that "extremely rare" category.
As others have also pointed out, he didn't do the actual editing. Ernesto Jr (aka Ray X) comments "this is as far as we've gotten with the editing". The "we" is indefinite (at least in translation). Ernesto and Diego and Judit work in the field, so it's totally believable that they did the actual editing.
Mateo heard the scene on DVD and knew something was wrong. I find this totally believable: acting is as much in the sound of the voice as in the movements of the face and body. He didn't have to see to know which was wrong and which was right. A poster found it "inconceivable" that Mateo would recognize voices after 14 years, but I find that one of the easiest parts to believe. We humans are not very good at imagining a voice we know, but we are very good at recognizing voices. (In fact, I recently had the experience of encountering someone I had not seen or spoken with in about 15 years. At first I did not recognize her face, but as soon as she spoke, I recognized her voice.) And Mateo was a film director -- probably with acting experience -- and so was deeply and professionally involved in the sound of voices. So yes, he absolutely would remember voices after 14 years, and would remember the good and bad takes and the sounds of the voices in each.
Yet another comment related to the photo of Lena in a drawer. It was not in his desk drawer but in a nearby storage drawer. In any case, why would he remove it if he can't see it? Judit retrieved the photos (including the bag) from the motel room. Probably she put them in that drawer. Mateo might not even have been aware of them until Diego started re-assembling the torn photos.
I too find quite a few weaknesses in the movie, but the only weakness I see in the blindness is that "cortical blindness" is sort of a convenience and not a believable diagnosis under the circumstances.
Edward
reply
share