As was the case with the book, the company was never approached by the filmmakers to obtain even a basic description of past work in Bosnia, to fact-check allegations or to obtain our position on these issues. For this reason we reached out to the representatives for the filmmakers to gain more information about the movie, its content and its relationship to the book.
When we contacted the film’s distributor to learn more, we were informed that the film “is a fictionalized, dramatic presentation” that, while partially “inspired by” Ms. Bolkovak’s experiences, is not based on her book. They stated that any assumptions that the movie is based on her book are “mistaken” and that the film has never been portrayed as a true story.
“The Whistleblower” Book.
Specific to Ms. Bolkovac’s allegations, they were made more than 10 years ago, were thoroughly investigated, and were aggressively and responsibly addressed.
At the time of Ms. Bolkovac’s employment and in the years that followed, Army Criminal Investigative Command (CID) authorities, the Inspectors General of the U.S. Department of Defense and the Department of State, and the company, all investigated allegations related to human trafficking. According to a statement made by a CID Special Agent, “neither DynCorp nor its employees were involved” in human trafficking, and the investigator found the Company to be “extremely cooperative and helpful” throughout his investigation.
In addition to cooperating fully with the CID investigation, DI conducted its own investigation. The Company did not find any evidence of human trafficking involving the Company, but did find areas where improvements could be made. As a result, a handful of individuals were fired, the Company reviewed and strengthened its procedures and policies, and integrated into its companywide training and employment agreements specific information about human trafficking and policies to prevent it. DI notified the Department of State and the United Nations of the results of its investigations and the actions taken to insert additional safeguards to prevent trafficking, and both were satisfied with DI’s actions.
Ms. Bolkovac’s limited first-hand knowledge of the company ended more than a decade ago. Since the time of her employment the company has changed ownership and leadership several times; developed a strict Code of Ethics and Business Conduct, which includes a zero tolerance policy on human trafficking; created the position of Chief Compliance Officer; introduced global training programs; and has taken a number of steps to ensure a compliant, ethical, successful workplace.
The Whistleblower: The movie the U.N. would prefer you didn't see
U.N. Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon traveled to Hollywood last year to cajole filmmakers and movie stars into making pictures that portray the U.N.'s good works. The Whistleblower, a scathing full-length account of the U.N. peacekeeping effort in Bosnia during the late 1990s, is not what he had in mind.
The Samuel Goldwyn Films movie, which is due out in theaters in Los Angeles and New York on Aug. 5, stars British actress Rachel Weisz as a U.N. policewoman who stumbles into the sordid world of Balkan sex trafficking and finds her fellow U.N. peacekeepers implicated in the trade.
It constitutes perhaps the darkest cinematic portrayal of a U.N. operation ever on the big screen, finding particular fault with top U.N. brass, the U.S. State Department, and a major U.S. contractor that supplies American policemen for U.N. missions.
The subject matter is familiar territory for Turtle Bay. A decade ago, I wrote a series of stories on U.N. police misconduct in Bosnia for the Washington Post, including a detailed account of U.S. police abuses and this piece documenting U.N. efforts to quash an investigation by a former Philadelphia cop, David Lamb, into allegations that Romanian peacekeepers participated in sex trafficking.
I would later contact Kathryn Bolkovac, a Nebraska cop (played by Weisz) who serves as the film's hero, and report on her lawsuit for wrongful dismissal against the subsidiary of an American contractor, DynCorp International, which hired her in Bosnia. (DynCorp countered that it had fired Bolkovac in part because she had falsified work documents, claiming hundreds of dollars in unwarranted per diem expenses.) Bolkovac's fictional employer in the film, Democra Services, appears to be based on DynCorp.
The actual abuses in Bosnia were so shocking that the film's director, Larysa Kondracki, told Turtle Bay that she had to tone it down to make it believable and to ensure that viewers didn't "tune it out." The movie, she said, in some ways resembles a "70s paranoid thriller" in which it can be hard to tell the difference between the heroes and the villains. Kondracki declined to name DynCorp as the model for the company portrayed in the movie, citing unspecified legal concerns.
A spokeswoman for DynCorp International, Ashley Burke, told Turtle Bay: "I haven't seen the movie so I can't comment on its content, but I can tell you that, when we contacted the film's distributor to learn more about the movie, we were informed that the film 'is a fictionalized dramatic presentation' that while inspired by Ms. Bolkovac's experiences, is not based on her book. There was no threatened legal action taken to ensure they did not use the company's name in the film."
The film opens with two Ukrainian 15-year-olds, Raya and Luba, partying in Kiev before heading off to the home of a devious in-law of one of the girls. He promises them high-paying jobs in a Swiss Hotel, but instead sells them off into sexual slavery in post-civil war Bosnia.
On the other side of the world, in Lincoln, Nebraska, Bolkovac has hit a dead end in her own police career when a friendly captain shows her a brochure from Democra Services. "They need good people to get the country up and running," he says. "Kathy, I think you'd be great at this."
Bolkovac jumps at the opportunity of a tax-free $100,000 salary, the prospect of adventure, and a rare chance to help a war-wracked, ethnically divided country return to the rule of law.
What she gradually discovers is a community of U.S. cops and other international peacekeepers corrupted by the moral compromises they make in Bosnia. What's worse, she learns, is that the U.N. diplomatic and peacekeeping corps are the brothels' primary customers, and in some cases they are actually trafficking Eastern European women into Bosnia.
Madeleine Rees (played by Vanessa Redgrave), a former U.N. human rights official who served in Bosnia, is the inspiration for one of the film's few heroic characters. As the U.N.'s top human rights officer in Bosnia, she recruits Bolkovac and encourages her to launch an investigation into sex trafficking. She puts her in touch with an internal affairs investigator, played by David Strathairn, who helps her navigate the U.N.'s treacherous bureaucracy.
Her investigation ultimately brings her into contact with Luba and Raya, whom she convinces to cooperate but whose lives she is ultimately unable to protect from their brutal Balkan pimps. The characters are essentially composites of the women who were enslaved in Bosnian brothels at the time. But Kondracki said that everything bad that happens in the film to the two girls -- one is tortured and the other murdered -- actually happened to women in Bosnia.
Indeed many of the most disturbing practices depicted in the film -- including the U.N. peacekeepers purchase of trafficked women -- have emerged in internal U.N. investigations. Some of the most disturbing practices by DynCorp employees came to light in court when Ben D. Johnston, an aircraft mechanic who worked for DynCorp in Bosnia in the late 1990s, sued the company in Fort Worth, Texas, charging he was punished for uncovering wrongdoing by DynCorp employees, including involvement in sexual slavery and the purchase of illegal weapons.
In the film, Bolkovac encounters violent resistance from Balkan organized-crimes elements as she tries to free the Ukrainian women and break up the sex-trafficking ring. But she also finds her efforts undermined by U.N. bureaucrats. Monica Bellucci, the cultured and stylish official from the International Migration Organization, callously returns the girls to the local police, who are on the payroll of their pimps, because they can't produce legal ID photos. The U.N. leadership, meanwhile, at the request of the U.S. State Department and Democra, has shut down her investigation and fires her.
The film's real-life heroes, Bolkovac and Rees, have long since left the United Nations. But DynCorp has prospered, securing billions of dollars in security contracts for the State Department in Iraq and Afghanistan. It has continued to be dogged by allegations of drug abuse and other misconduct problems.
Thank you for this well-written explanation of the film back-story. The allegations were countered in a post by 'SPICO', who apparently works for DynCorp, and refuted everything. I don't believe Spico.
Secretary-General Invites Whistleblower to Screen at U.N. Headquarters
It might have taken nearly a year, but United Nations leadership is finally aligning itself with The Whistleblower, the new film based on the experience of a peacekeeper who witnessed U.N. complicity in sex-trafficking in Bosnia in the late ’90s/early ’00s. And while Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon might not yet have clambered aboard the film’s Rachel Weisz awards-season bandwagon, he’s definitely paving its road ahead with an invitation for the film to screen at U.N. headquarters in New York.
According to a report on Foreign Policy’s U.N. blog Turtle Bay, Ban sent a letter to filmmaker Larysa Kondracki expressing his appreciation for her having sent him the movie and his remorse at the dark episode of U.N. history it exposes — as well as offering a goodwill gesture to hopefully move awareness in the right direction:
“Last week, I saw the film with my senior advisors,” Ban wrote in a letter to Kondracki. “I was pained by what I saw. I was also saddened by the involvement of the international community, particularly of the United Nations, in the abuses connected with the trafficking of women and their use as sex slaves, as highlighted in the movie.” […]
Ban used the letter to outline steps the United Nations has taken in recent years to address human trafficking, including the implementation of a “zero tolerance” program and the creation of a conduct and discipline office within the department of peacekeeping. “But I recognize, rules and measures alone are insufficient. The culture must change. I am determined to lead by example. At the United Nations we shall recommit to the fundamental tenets of international public service,” he wrote. “I want to assure you that we shall embrace the challenge your film places before the United Nations….The vulnerable women whose condition your film showcases will not be forgotten. Thank you for raising this important issue with such passion.”
On the one hand, Ban kind of says too much: The peacekeepers seen aiding, abetting and even participating in sex-trafficking in The Whistleblower are, by and large, hired by private contractors and not by the U.N. itself. On the other, the impenetrable, infuriating bureaucracy of the U.N.’s Eastern European operation is shown to be just shy of totally corrupt in its dealings with contractors and title character Kathryn Bolkovac herself (played by Weisz). In other words, Ban can’t swiftly effect change where the change is needed most (Congo, anybody?), but can recognize that the opportunity to pledge change looks great on paper. Thanks, Hollywood.
But wait, Ban writes — there’s more:
I welcome your suggestion that The Whistleblower be screened especially for United Nations senior staff. I propose to go further. I have asked that a special screening be arranged at United Nations Headquarters not only for staff but also for Member States, with the full support of the President of the General Assembly. As suggested by you, after the screening, we shall have a panel discussion as the starting point for a frank and honest discussion of the issues the film raises. I hope you will be able join in this engagement.
Damn. Now that’s results! And such good timing, too, what with The Whistleblower expanding into additional cities this week. (The film originally premiered last September in Toronto.) There’s hardly any guarantee that a U.N. audience will move the needle for a film culturally or socially (just ask Harvey Weinstein), but exposure can’t hurt the cause. Or rather, it can’t hurt the causes — not Kondracki’s, not distributor Samuel Goldwyn’s, not the United Nations’, and most definitely not Weisz’s. February, here we come!
I never said that I rejected the claim that DynoCorp was involved in human trafficking in Bosnia. All I did was post their answer to the movie. I think it is important to hear both sides of the story, but that does not eman that I work for Dynocorp or that I believe that they were not involved in this scandal.
Specific to Ms. Bolkovac’s allegations, they were made more than 10 years ago, were thoroughly investigated, and were aggressively and responsibly addressed.
Yeah, I bet they did!!
At the time of Ms. Bolkovac’s employment and in the years that followed, Army Criminal Investigative Command (CID) authorities, the Inspectors General of the U.S. Department of Defense and the Department of State, and the company, all investigated allegations related to human trafficking. According to a statement made by a CID Special Agent, “neither DynCorp nor its employees were involved” in human trafficking, and the investigator found the Company to be “extremely cooperative and helpful” throughout his investigation.
What else is to be expected from such investigations? The truth can be adjusted. ~ Michael Clayton
In addition to cooperating fully with the CID investigation, DI conducted its own investigation. The Company did not find any evidence of human trafficking involving the Company, but did find areas where improvements could be made. As a result, a handful of individuals were fired, the Company reviewed and strengthened its procedures and policies, and integrated into its companywide training and employment agreements specific information about human trafficking and policies to prevent it. DI notified the Department of State and the United Nations of the results of its investigations and the actions taken to insert additional safeguards to prevent trafficking, and both were satisfied with DI’s actions.
That's incredibly generous of them. Maybe it's the company's progress that's making its competitor weave out these conspiracies. You missed out including the conspiracy theory in your too convincing post!!!
Ms. Bolkovac’s limited first-hand knowledge of the company ended more than a decade ago. Since the time of her employment the company has changed ownership and leadership several times; developed a strict Code of Ethics and Business Conduct, which includes a zero tolerance policy on human trafficking; created the position of Chief Compliance Officer; introduced global training programs; and has taken a number of steps to ensure a compliant, ethical, successful workplace.
Bravo. How I wish our definitions of zero tolerance were one and the same!