There were hundreds of thousands of troops, nearly all male, who did not have wives or girlfriends with them, and who had lots of expendable income. This made a much more fertile environment for prostitution,
This.
Pretty much everywhere the US/NATO military forces go, there is prostitution.
Even in Iraq and Afghanistan.
Especially considering these military contractors are actually
immune to prosecution for ANY crime, as they do not fall under the jurisdiction of military courts (which ordinarily govern foreign occupying forces) as they operate as civilian contractors, who are only accountable to US Civil Courts and would never be extradited anyway.
The Peacekeeper Sex-Trafficking controversy in Bosnia has been mirrored in numerous other conflict zones that were moderated by UN forces after hostilities ended. Haiti, Kosovo, Rwanda, Sierra Leone and Papua New Guinea just to name a few.
There were cases where UN soldiers had sex/gang raped Bosnian women/girls. No trafficking though.
So yeah, mostly organized crime connected from Balkans to Baltic moved girls around.
That's what I assumed as well.
I've personally known a lot of Sarajlijas who lived in Sarajevo during and after the war and if you'd ask them about sex trafficking they'd give you a puzzled look.
There's prostitution of course, but like the majority of Europe these women are either of Russian or ex-Soviet extraction and not local Bosnian women.
When the Defecation hits the Oscillation
reply
share