MovieChat Forums > Into the Blue 2: The Reef (2009) Discussion > Why is Audrina not on the cover in a bik...

Why is Audrina not on the cover in a bikini!

posted 16 years ago by w22nuschler
9 replies | jump to latest

I was very happy to find out tonight that Into the Blue 2 is being released on April 21st. I was very upset that Audrina did not make the cover. The blonde is hot and looks great in a bikini, but Audrina is hotter.

I was also worried when I read the press release on another site that said "Featuring an appearance by Audrina Patridge. That tells me her part is minor. I know we will see her in a green bikini because of all the photos I've seen on the internet. I was hoping this would be like the first movie where there we two couples. This will really upset me if she gets a small part.

All of these web sites have been talking for months about her being one of the stars of the film. I feel like we are being lied to again like with the first movie. Everyone said Jessica Alba is in a bikini for the entire movie, when in fact she might have had about 10 minutes in a bikini.

[–] cool302 16 years ago

that's true but you have to admit the first one was good and the second one is probably going to be good as well!

[–] tymes 16 years ago

Adrianna's (sorry I don't know her name) publicists lied to you, I don't know if they had anything to do with this movie.

I don't know Adrianna (or her name) but I know Laura (or just her name)... The first is a reality star? and the second an actual actress.

[–] Dave-36 16 years ago

Why is Audrina in this movie at all? She isn't an actress, all of these reality show people need to stay out of the movies. Luckily, we only have to suffer through Audrina's bad attempts at dialogue delivery for the mere two scenes she is in.

[–] Silent-Sinner 16 years ago

has less then four minutes screen time.
She plays the Girlfriend of the Main characters Rival & has 2 Scenes which both involve her telling her Bf off.

http://www.fanfiction.net/~somethingmorethenpersonal

[–] 16 years ago

[deleted]

[–] tbll04 15 years ago

Shes not even in the movie that much and Laura is way hotter than her and she's a pretty good actress as well. Actually Audrina shouldn't even have been in the movie if you ask me.

[–] xoxobabe 15 years ago

I couldn't stand Audrina in the movie. She can't act. I'm just thankful she wasn't in the whole movie because I actually liked the movie.

[–] alirioaguero2 10 years ago

Having Audrina on the cover would make no sense, since there are at least 10 more important characters than her. Her whole appearance is maybe 2 minutes tops and her character has zero impact on the overall plot. If she was totally cut out of the film, it wouldn't make any difference. I wonder how she keeps getting single credits on the opening for such small roles. She is hot, though.

[–] tlm557 9 years ago

Because they put main characters on the covers and she's not one of them... and, NO, she isn't hotter.