Handheld camera


The main review on IMDB says that it is filmed with a handheld camera. It sounds like a good movie, but does it bounce all over the place? Or, is it pretty still?

reply

Some scenes are greatly captured and you won't even notice the handheld-camera fact, while other scenes are not that greatly captured.

To those who've watched this, isn't the camera work a little too dodgy and the duration is a bit too long for when the camera follows the phone cable or something. I recalled it wasn't very nice seeing it on the theater's screen, almost made me feel dizzy.

And uh, I seriously don't get the background of the story, which in my opinion this movie did not really discuss. In terms of story it has its strong moments but I think the flow isn't very nice. It's not an unforgettable thing.

Is that so to you guys?

reply

The only time I noticed the camera work for itself was in the cord scene but I thought it was pretty cool, not disorienting, very interesting to follow the the cord.

reply

I didn't even realized this movie was filmed with a handheld camera. It did not look like it to me. They did a great job if it was.

reply

same here, it wasn't distracting at all. It was very well done!

reply

Just came home from seeing the movie.
Didn't notice this at all...
Doesn't look like a handheld.

reply

I'm not sure it was a handheld, IMDB says it's in 35mm. I watch it on a big screen in theatre it didn't bounce much, the only VERY annoying thing is the use of so many rack focus.

reply

In the special features segment of the movie's DVD, the use of a Steadicam or equivalent is shown being used for filming.

reply