MovieChat Forums > The Last House on the Left (2009) Discussion > I would have done something else to Krug

I would have done something else to Krug


the paralyzing was a good idea, but the microwave thing was too quick for me. I would have tortured him by doing things to his face with a mirror in front of him the whole time so he could see. Then I'd make him stay there and starve to death

*´¨)
¸.·´¸.·*´¨) ¸.·*¨)
(¸.·´ (¸.·´

reply

Like in Law Abiding Citizen.

reply

Yeah, the microwave was far too quick.

I would have tortured him for months and probably not let him die. I hate evil people like that and I am sorry if I sound as bad as him. But what he did was so evil, he has to pay for it. Prison's no good, or a quick death. All he would understand is agonizing, constant pain.

reply

Yes, because I'm sure the father had nothing better to do for the next several months than spend them torturing some lowlife murderer and rapist. It's not like he had a traumatized wife and daughter to take care of, or anything like that...

reply

I thought after f'ing everyone else up in there little clan, microwaving his brain was fairly adequate killing.

reply

Castration without anesthesia.

reply

Castration definitely! But I would let Krug live and give him his nuts back in a jar and laugh in his face.lol

"A real man would rather bow down to a strong woman than dominate a weak one"

reply

Yes, a castration would've been good for him. The original had one, I Spit On Your Grave had one, so this film should've had one as well. Plus, it would ensure he would never go around raping people again.

I've been waiting for you, Ben.

reply

Yes, a castration would've been good for him. The original had one, I Spit On Your Grave had one, so this film should've had one as well. Plus, it would ensure he would never go around raping people again.

Well, he can't go around raping anyone with his head blown to bits either, but I agree the microwave thing was much too kind. He should've been sodomized with a broomstick and then castrated.

reply

agree!!!got off way too easy


Trolls dont have an opinion....just an urge to compensate their frustration about themselves!!!

reply

He was paralyzed from the neck down. It might have been a better punishment to get him to hospital and let him live off the next few years in a hospital bed.

reply

And maybe cut off his arms

A person can really hurt people without having a penis, but pretty hard without arms.

reply

You should be neutered.

reply

[deleted]

[deleted]

[deleted]

You're all as bad or worse than the antagonist in the film. Noone deserves any of that, no matter what they have done.

reply

wanting an evil person to suffer doesn't make us as bad as him, are you *beep* me right now? he definitely deserved to have been tortured, slowly and very painfully.


If you love Satan and are 100% proud, copy this and make it your signature!

reply

He deserved to suffer yes....but most important was the rehabilitation of the daughter. So I think it was right that he was disposed off like a dish rag and SHE was given priority. It was actually satisfactory to see the female treated as all important and the male as a worthless POS when we have had centuries of the opposite.

reply

Oh please! What does he deserve then, a hug?

reply

There's not really any point to that, Brett.

reply

He suffered for less than what, 15 seconds?

Think of all the suffering he caused? The friend getting stabbed, the rape, the list goes on and on and ya just know he's caused similar pain and suffering probably most of his life.

Plus the dad got to get a taste of revenge, what about the daughter?

If he'd killed my friend and raped me, I'd sure have wanted to cause him suffering, including some penis pain

Disappointing ending, so agree the pain should have lasted much longer, maybe even left us to wonder if it'd last for weeks/months.

reply

Wouldn't the doc be done for murder for paralyzing the guy and frying his brain in a microwave?

reply

I would have castrated him of course!

reply