Dare I say it...
The actor that played the rapist was hot! Garett something. They should have chosen another actor. The whole time I kept thinking how hot he was. It was distracting! Directors should never cast a hot rapist. It's just weird.
shareSo based on your statement, if the rapist is attractive that makes the crime ok?? It shouldn't matter how hot the rapist is. A rapist is still a rapist. Moron.
shareThe op has a point. Lol. That's the world we live in. Women have rape fantasies. Look it up. And it's not ugly guys in their fantasies that's for sure.
shareTHANK YOU, these posts are infuriating me. News flash everybody, hot guys can rape too! How anyone could be attracted to a monster character like that is disgusting, and saying that his attractiveness "distracted" you from the rape scene?!? May you never be on a jury. Or have children.
shareThat's not how I interpret what they posted.
They never said it made the crime okay, just that it made it distracting to see the character as such a bad guy.
Actually the director himself stated that the woman they cast to be raped was selected because she wasn't drop dead gorgeous. They didn't want the males to be attracted to the scene. So same could be said about the guy and his attractiveness.
shareThat's absolutely NOT what the OP was implying, and to come to that conclusion without evidence is stupid. You put words into the OP's mouth, and your inferences don't logically follow. The actor, Garrett Dillahunt, is very handsome. His character is bad. There's a disconnect between the handsome actor and the horrible character and his actions. It was distracting for the OP. This is what he/she means. You inferred incorrectly.
share