MovieChat Forums > The Darjeeling Limited (2007) Discussion > The Darjeeling Limited - Symbolism Revea...

The Darjeeling Limited - Symbolism Revealed


The Darjeeling Limited is not intended for everyone, and will surely be disliked by many movie critics. To capture the true beauty of The Darjeeling, you must understand the symbols presented throughout the film. There is a large amount of symbolism in this movie, but the 3 main elements are: the 3 feathers, the belt, and all of the suitcases carried by the brothers. Each object carries a symbolic message, which can be viewed upon close interpretation of the film.

Each brother is presented with a feather. These feathers can represent different things; but one of them is they way you feel about the way life is going. When they perform the ritual, we can clearly see that each brother feels differently about the way their life is going. Francis Whitman (Owen Wilson) performs the ritual correctly, symbolizing that he is excited about his future, and will keep his past in the back of his mind (burying the feather under a rock). Francis feels that his spiritual journey will change him for the better. Peter Witman (Adrien Brody) does not feel the same way about his life. Not only doesn't he burry the feather, but he keeps it. This symbolizes the feeling of being incomplete. With a baby expected in the next 6 weeks, he feels uneasy and confused, not sure where his life is going. Peter is scared to let go of his past, and move forward. He fears a major change in his life, and is afraid to break out of his comfort zone, so he keeps the feather. Finally, Jack Whitman (Jason Schwartzman) lets the feather get blown away by the wind. This represents unhappiness and anger. Jack wants to forget his past, and to start a new life. He does not want to get involved in conversations, and writes short stories to help him move in the right direction (seeking happiness). The stories were described by Peter to have an angry nature. But the wind can only take a feather so far, and Jack will eventually have to confront his feelings in order to move on.

Francis carries a valuable belt, which represents love. The belt carries old, loving memories of his past; and at times, he gave the belt to Peter, ready to leave his old memories behind in order to create new ones. However, when Francis feels unhappy/depressed/angry, he seeks the old love again by taking the belt away from Peter. This happens a few times throughout the movie, symbolizing that Peter is not yet ready to give up a material object of love. Whenever Francis gives his belt to Peter permanently, it is a symbol that he is happy, and has created new loving memories on his journey. He is also passing his love down to Peter, who is in desperate need of it. As one would say, "Let the belt work for you as it did for me".

One more element of symbolism in The Darjeeling Limited are the suitcases of the brothers. All of the suitcase represents the past lives of the Whitman brothers. Whether it be happy, sad, or neutral memories. Whenever they travel, they always keep their suitcases close-by. However, as they experience a spiritual change towards the end of the movie, they don't need their past anymore. While running to catch a train, they all throw their suitcases on the ground, leaving them behind. This is the turning point of The Darjeeling, symbolizing that all 3 brothers have experienced a spiritual change, and are ready to make new lives for themselves. Shortly after, they perform the feather ritual together correctly, a symbol of true change.

The Darjeeling Limited is a movie based on symbolism, with a message behind each line, character, and event. You may have to re-watch the movie to gain the intended insight of the director. But The Darjeeling is meant to be a work of art, not an entertaining film. It is a symbol of life, and the things we do as a people in order to change our own.


Visit http://wwww.filminsight.net for more articles written by me.

reply

I have a different take on the symbolism of the feathers. I apologize if my view mirrors anyone else's as I've not perused the thread that addresses the feathers specifically. To me, what the brothers actually do with their feathers illustrates for us that very thing they need to let go in order to move on.

Francis Whitman (Owen Wilson) performs the ritual correctly...

This is a clear illustration of Francis' need for orderliness and control in his life.
Peter Witman (Adrien Brody) does not feel the same way about his life. Not only doesn't he burry the feather, but he keeps it.

Peter refuses to bury his father. He holds on to his father's belongings, as if they are him, and refuses to let go.
Finally, Jack Whitman (Jason Schwartzman) lets the feather get blown away by the wind.

Jack's life is dictated by the fickle (wind-like) nature of his ex-girlfriend. He blows about on the whim of her fancy.

reply

I agree with everything besides the belt.

Francis was frustrated with Brenden because his mother didn't tell Brendan if she wanted to see them or what. He then left Brenden's cabin and gave the belt to Peter. And then later when he took the belt back from Peter, he was mad at Peter himself.

And if you noticed I spelt Brendan differently everytime, cause I don't know the correct spelling of it at the moment :P

reply

[deleted]

ah, dreck...my favorite angry-yet-very-smart person. I'm very interested in hearing your take on the film.

reply

[deleted]

What cat do you fall in? It's not as clear to me as you might think.

reply

[deleted]

i'll likely continue to wish wes anderson didn't have that cutesy/prancy disease.

I actually like this about him. Very much, but I wouldn't mind seeing him freshen it up a bit. I like his use of color and settings, but I'd rather see them look timeless, instead of frozen in time.

reply

haha - you beat me too it!

reply

The do the feather before the let go of the luggage. That luggage is also a bit literal, represented by the "baggage" of their father's death, and the turmoil brewed from it.

reply

I think the suitcases represented a little more than the past, they were in essence their baggage and issues that they were letting go of.

The more you suffer, the more it shows you really care.

reply

Wasn't the luggage Dad's?


He who fights with monsters should look to it that he himself does not become a monster. -Nietzsche

reply

Nice observations, Chezzy62.

Does anyone have a theory on the shoes?

Francis lost a shoe.
Peter bought shoes.
Jack didn't have shoes.

And also, about the kids in the river..

3 boys, 1 father, no mother.

reply

Yes. The movie is a 90 minute 'Baggage' pun

reply

@gringo_benedicto

yeah i thought this as well, I think it was the boy that Brody tried to save, died is connected to the fact that he later finds he is having a son - and to me it seems almost more important to be at the funeral of the boy than their fathers.

reply

The obvious use of the suitcases to represent their personal baggage was a little much for me but I figured maybe Wes was doing that on purpose since some of the complaints about his movies are the symbolism. This one you couldn't miss. Then I thought he was poking fun at himself and symbolism in general which I always enjoy.

reply

Dang you said it all.

reply