Cancelled.


http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/live-feed/hbo-cancels-treatment-172960

So sad to see it end.

reply

At least it's not a DEFINITE cancellation:

"We are in continued conversations with the executive producers to find another way to continue telling these rich stories"

Maybe they can find a way to tell multiple stories in one weekly hour-long episode. They can cut back and forth and change the whole pace of the show. I know one of the great things about In Treatment is its gradual pace and breathing room, but if that had to be sacrificed to yield a fourth season pick-up, I don't think that would be such a bad thing. It might be kind of interesting to see an entire season of episodes where the stories keep switching back and forth, not showing us every single thing they're saying, leaving us always on the edge of our seats, wondering and trying to figure out what's going on and what's going to happen next.

Let's not give up all hope YET.

reply

That's a shame, but I felt there was a massive drop-off with Season 3. The Debra Winger segment in particular was extremely boring.

reply

Too bad. But the show clearly suffered at the hands of the american writers.
The two first seasons felt real and deep to me. But the third was too straight-forward in it's understanding of the human mind.
-Frances and Jessie in particular was too clear-cut and obvious from day one. Both were staple characters from thousands of movies and tv-shows. Not authentic.
-Sunil was interesting but forced. Stagey.As if to forge a mystery for the viewer.
-Pauls new therapist reduced his relationship with his prior therapist, too much. Summing Paul Weston up in 5 minutes and presenting it with a nice bow on top.
-And weston himself suddenly only a depressed, disillusioned emotionally impotent man.
All the juicy fleshed out characters you could identify with, emphatize and invest complex feelings in and look forward to learn from,- were gone.
The first two seasons made people, the human mind, interesting. It was a level of writing and acting that recalled Bergman.
The third was tv-show version of pop-psychology.
Zoidberg

reply

The first two seasons weren't written by American writers, merely translated. The original show is Israeli, and like all US adaptations, they started by just translating the episodes with minor adjustments (for instance, the fighter pilot in season 1 was part of the IDF in the original version, but went to Afghanistan or Iraq in the US version) and then take their own liberties as the show flops or succeeds.

reply

I know.
That's my point. When the american writers started writing their own material, we're left with the staple "tv-show psychology" as opposed to the authenticity of the first two seasons.
That's why I had no interest in this show continuing after the third season.


Zoidberg

reply

I think Season 3 was simply the best thing I've ever seen on TV, because it was the most lifelike literary artwork ever on TV … at least that I have seen.

I don't think the average person can see this, just like Paul cannot see himself and his little fits when he is in Adele's office.

People are raised to be simple minded, so the reality of the world is too difficult for them to accept, especially when everyone is on a different page with different powers - what is what makes life terrifying. Some are lucky enough to have the support and security they need to grow, but most are not, and many of those that do grow use their insights to manipulate other people.

The scene with Jesse where he knocks on Paul's door late at night versus Paul's attempted manipulations of Adele in his next session and how childish he becomes when she will not be manipulated by him.

Paul is not a bad guy, I think we're meant to understand that we are all like this, we are all selfish hypocrites that by nature cannot see the objective truth of what is going on in our lives.

reply

Sad but not surprised. Season 3 was a huge drop off from Season 1 and Season 2.

reply

If season 3 is a huge drop off it must be shockingly bad. Season 2 is currently airing in the UK on Sky Atlantic and I think there is a major drop in quality from season 1. I have to say the Paul Weston character is a bitter and deeply irritating man who I struggle to have any empathy for. I wouldn't say I have hated Gabriel Byrne's acting in the past, though horribly miscast in Little Women, but I cannot tolerate him in this. I have decided to give up on this show particularly as it is said to be cancelled.

reply

"I have to say the Paul Weston character is a bitter and deeply irritating man who I struggle to have any empathy for."

Yup, that was the whole point of the series. Weston is a therapist who has gone off the rails and it can be argued was doing more harm than good for many of his clients. Once upon a time he was clearly good at his job, but lost interest and was just operating on autopilot most of the time.

Any therapist who had done half the stuff Weston did such as engaging in an affair with one of his clients or moving from a therapeutic relationship to a friendship with Sunil would have lost his or her license.

While the overall quality of the third season was not nearly as good as the first two seasons, at least it brought this central issue into focus.

reply

You are right. The show has been on a slippery slope.

Season one was great and I was hoping they would smoothen the melodramatic bits but in season 2, it went up.

Season 3, believe it or not, was even worse. But it wasn't just the writing this time. The acting in season 3 was generally worse. Even Byrne seemed off at times, no doubt hampered by weaker writing and character development that is way off.

Other sure signs that this series was on the way out were that seasons were getting shorter and shorter, as was the average length of each episode.

Too bad. Season 1 hinted at a potential for one of the best series of all times. But the potential never materialized.

reply

season 1 was one of the best seasons of television I'd ever seen, it was hard to ever live up to those sorts of expectations.

reply

Couldn't agree more. Byrne is always a pleasure to watch, but he seemed so perfect in this role. I hope they find a way to re-vamp the show and bring it back.

reply

d'oh.

amazing show.

-
Shuji Terayama forever.

reply

I haven't seen all of Season 3, but what I have isn't up to par with the other two . . .

Given that there's a consensus here above the dip in quality over pretty much that entire season, it's no wonder that viewership (and revenues) dropped off. More of the same would probably have occurred had they gone ahead, leading to a more high-profile cancellation mid-season.

Best to end it before it starts recycling plot ideas. Bravo for what it accomplished.

reply

NO!!!!!!!! I suppose they had a good run. I only recently started watching, I'm addicted. Found it very interesting and left of centre viewing. But as they say, All good things come to an end.

reply