last scene meaning?
what did the last scene mean? was he going after dracula to kill him? because he followed him in his suit saying 'let the games begin'.
sharewhat did the last scene mean? was he going after dracula to kill him? because he followed him in his suit saying 'let the games begin'.
shareHe was going for his revenge against the demon that turned him.
sharebut the master vampire turned vlad. so why was would the master vampire be following vlad for revenge? wouldn't it be the other way round?
shareits not clear if hes going after vlad, or just "looking over him" (ie, spying/stalking as vlad cant seem to detect he has been followed by another vampire for over 6 centuries). maybe he will show up to him to further discuss what his powers convey, specially now that the ending hints that the sequel could be bram stoker's book now, set in modern times. this guy does not appear in the original book, so theres no telling what could happen.
shareWhen the monster in the mountain "turned" Dracula and gave him his 3 days, he told him that if he became a monster too and could not control the urge for blood, that it would free the "original" monster from his prison in the mountain and that he would then go on to take revenge on the demon who turned HIM and imprisoned him in the mountain and that he would use Dracula as a "pawn" in his battle.
He referred to it as the great battle between "good and evil". I believe that the "original" monster had been following Vlad and that he chose the moment Vlad "found" Morena again to start his battle. How much more fun would it be if Vlad's one true love was also a pawn in his game... it would give him so much more power over Dracula!
The explanation inside the mountain was short so it would have been easy to miss. But it's clear they were setting it up for a sequel if the money and the audience proved to be there for it.
This may not have been the "real history" but on the other hand, it was no "Abraham Lincoln Vampire Killer either"!