i might be wrong but i dont remember the police ever confirming that they were initiating a murder investigation. considering the circumstances at the time (girl was with family, never came out of lake), it would have probably been ruled as an accidental death. when they found the footage of the neighbour snooping through the house they may have started a separate investigation though for B&E, but a proper manhunt couldnt really ensue over suspicious, unprovable links to her death (and the wanted level for a pair of home invaders is not going to be so strongly enforced across multiple police districts).
Keeping in mind that this was taking place in a rural Australian town where the local police can only investigate so far (and nothing really suggested that they initiated a KALOF on the couple beyond their jurisdiction), and that the doco was supposedly set quite some time later, which suggests that the sex scandal may have been blanketed until it was disclosed in the documentary.
i think the reason why the movie worked so well is that its collection of bizarre events were not really that implausible. sex at the age of 16, whilst frowned upon by many, is not uncommon in most places, and given her location, psychological make up and appearance, i didn't think it was that out-of-character (although still unexpected) that she would do such a thing. however, afterwards it could have really bothered her in hindsight.
i don't really think she was raped or abused either. she looked consensual, its still pretty uncomfortable to consider though. and with her age she may have been more vulnerable to persuasion from older adults, like an attempt to equal up to their maturity, or to feel like the important element of a machine to make up for the fact that she was just another face in the group of her friends (no more-or-less important than the rest)
the neighbours disappearing real quickly does make it more ambiguous though.
reply
share