Eddie's cute grins made him look insane
Once or twice was okay, but repeatedly when he was "Lili" made him look insane. Bad directing, I think.
shareOnce or twice was okay, but repeatedly when he was "Lili" made him look insane. Bad directing, I think.
shareI completely agree. I was wondering what was off about his acting.. then I realized that that's what it was. I think the idea was to make him appear more shy and fragile, but to me it made it a bit too over-acting.
shareThank you, Maxie. It also occurred to me that this could have been an attempt to show the split personalities, as in feminine coquettishness, but it failed if that was the intention.
shareWhat turned me off was Lili's wig: masculine cut on the left side, feminine curls on the right, and in either case, he still looked like a male person. Perhaps it was another attempt to show split personalities.
shareYes, it was vulnerability.
shareMust agree. Eddie's sidelong grins as Lili wore very thin, but that didn't seem to discourage Hooper from loading up on'em.
*Danny's not here, Mrs. Torrance*
Eddie Redmayne is a bit creepy to be fair. In real life he's so akward and idiotic.
I'm not much on rear-window ethics.
That is complete nonsense to say he is idiotic. Watch his interviews on You Tube, hardly an idiot. And who are you being fair to? When you use the expression "to be fair" you should make a positive comment to somewhat contradict a negative one.
shareIdiotic would be the wrong word.
He acts like an uppity, inbred prissy twit.
He is so awkward.
I'm not much on rear-window ethics.
Completely agree.
Furthermore, the constant simpering and affectations of what he seemed to think was womanly made him seem totally nuts.
He acted and looked like a drag queen, not like a woman. No mentally stable woman has such over affected mannerisms and grimaces. I think the directing was terrible, he didn't pass for a woman at all, yet the real Einer/Lilly did.
Also I find it totally disingenuous to put on the same level the issues linked to being intersex (Einer's case) with transgender issues. The former is unambiguously biological, the other has so far no biological basis and therefore lends itself to culture wars between those who think it's a mental illness/syndrome and those who think it's some kind of non quantifiable biological issue.
Anyways, rubbish movie.
>he other has so far no biological basis
Oh really? You should read more on brain research of transsexuals....
I have, at this stage, it's all theories. Nothing has been proven in peer approved papers. Very little research has been done so far and the few studies done have been heavily criticized by the medical community for their poor foundation, execution and replicability.
Some day we might find some kind of currently undetectable biological basis...or not, but as of today, mainstream brain science is in its infancy compared to the rest of medicine, let alone transgender brain science, and this for a very good reason: human brains are unique and can't be widely experimented on. You can experiment on different animals to figure out liver functions, lung functions etc. But not when it comes to brains, very little can be infered from working on a chimp brain that relates to human cognitive function.
The only thing that has been proven so far via identical twin studies is that: homosexuality and transgender-ism is NOT genetic. Doesn't mean it can't be biological (the jury is still out on that one from a scientific point of view), just means it's not genetic.
I doubt there will be any breakthroughs about this (re: disphoria) any time soon other than by accident (ie co finding from another study) as transgenders represent such a small part of society (despite their current constant visability because the media has decided that it's the fashionable issue of the season): no lab or university is going to spend millions on researching this as they'd never get their money back due to the size of the population affected. And these days medical research is ruled by one thing and one thing only: r.o.i.
No mentally stable woman has such over affected mannerisms and grimaces.
Anything but cute, actually - just terribly annoying after the first couple of minutes.
His inane grin reminded me of the late, great Charles Chaplin - well, the mouth anyway. I wonder if he's any relation?
it reminded me of the joker's smile
shareI thought it was a wonderful, beautiful movie, but I too thought Redmayne acted too "girly." I also think it was probably the direction he was given. Constantly clutching the scarf around his neck, the coy grins, the tilted head. He even cried too much. Vikander's performance was just heartbreaking. She was begging for her husband and he flatly refused to be there for her, yet he expected her to be there for him whenever it was convenient. In the end, I'm glad he told her how lucky he was to have had such love. As Redmayne said himself, Vikander really upped his game at every turn.
"Leave me to do my dark bidding on the internet!"