MovieChat Forums > The Danish Girl (2016) Discussion > Did we really need to see...

Did we really need to see...


Full frontal on Eddie Redmayne?

He was circumcised!

reply

How did you see that? You must have got the cut version!

reply

You must have got the cut version!


It was a blink and you miss it thing when he was changing.

reply

Maybe I got the cut version

reply

Maybe I got the cut version


You got the cut version if you saw a circumcised penis but an uncut version if it wasn't.

reply

LOL. Yes I was trying to be punny. How do you know if it was cut or not, though? He didnt show all of the kraken.

reply

He showed the right part.

Blink and you miss it.

reply

I'll take your word on that. 👍
Doesnt bother me to see full frontal male nudity on screen, nor does it bother me to see female nudity. Both of them have lovely bodies.

reply

I'll take your word on that. 👍



If you see the movie again, slow down at the part where he is undressing in front of the mirror.

You can see his family jewels.

reply

LOL. Well I dont go out of my way to see an actor's package but if it's there on screen I dont get offended, the same as I dont get offended if I see a woman breastfeeding in public (topical issue). It's just the human body. Sure I dont want a guy IRL running upto me in the street and waving his dong around, the same as I dont want a woman to wave her mammaries around, but if it's in a movie or tv show and it's not just blatant T&A for the sake of it, doesnt bother me if it's there, and doesnt bother me if it 's not there either.

reply

Cool

reply

What he was doing in that scene was certainly central to the story, so I don't know why anyone would be offended by it. In any case, there was plenty of forewarning of where it was "headed" - so to speak! - such that those who might have been could avert their gaze.

reply

What he was doing in that scene was certainly central to the story, so I don't know why anyone would be offended by it. In any case, there was plenty of forewarning of where it was "headed" - so to speak! - such that those who might have been could avert their gaze.


^^^Exactly.

reply

I sure didn't.

reply

It made sense and in fact was a necessary in this movie to give a raw feel at the emotion Lili/Eynar was having at that very moment.

can't outrun your own shadow

reply

[deleted]

Of course we did!
Sex change is all about the sexual organs (not only, of course, but still, this is all about not feeling right in the bodies they have). Him hiding his (despized) actual male organ in order to look like a woman, that was such an important and meaningful scene!
It's just a body.

Images & imagination can change your world

reply

Why? Afraid of getting turned on?

Shouldn't women get equal naked time? I myself am sick of seeing so much female nudity while men don't reciprocate.

reply