MovieChat Forums > Bright Star (2009) Discussion > The snubs just keep on coming....

The snubs just keep on coming....


http://filmexperience.blogspot.com/2010/01/unlucky-star.html
For those of you who may have missed the blog from Film Experience about the Costume Designer Guild Awards.
Just one more instance of the continuing snubs against this film. It's nice to know that it's just not those of us who have posted on this board for months but critics, bloggers and others continue to wonder what the *beep* is up with this crap?!?!? I just wanted to share the joy...






I think she's the saddest girl ever to hold a martini.

reply

Iknow - I mean, the loin cloths "worn" in Avatar for crying out loud were nominated!!!

reply

What a *beep* joke. It's obvious that the artistic merits of this film for whatever reason have been lost on the award givers this year. I suppose Bright Star's distributers didn't grease enough of the already apparently slimy hands of the elite. If it doesn't get recognized at all by Oscar, then *beep* the Academy! I won't be watching it this year!



I think she's the saddest girl ever to hold a martini.

reply

you can't have seen many BBC period dramas - the costumes are always very good ... probably something to do with the fact the Beeb has been around since the dawn of time and those costumes are actually originals! The directors are usually resurrected with the costumes as well, which explains the dry feel to BBC drama

----------------------------------------
I don't know what it is, but its weird and pissed off!

reply

Go for it! And when you start smacking, let me know, 'cause I'll be right there, smackin' with you!!

reply

[deleted]

Maybe it isn't snubs. Maybe the film just isn't as good as some think it is. The movie had some real flaws. Believe me an art film has a real chance to shine big time. But this movie, like it or not is no Shakespeare in love. It was clumsy in its execution, and had some really boring parts. The thing that failed the movie was in how the love between the two did not play out right. You have love being denied or walked away from or forced into exile, but this movie failed in how it resolved or canceled the love. The ending left a bad taste that completely burned most of the beauty from the minds of viewers. Granted, this kind of movie (since it is best on real people) wasn't easy to film, but, that doesn't forgive some real flaws in closure that the film has. I heard others condemning those who expected a bio-pic but that is how this felt to me. Being faithful to life at the expense of being faithful to the characters in the movie. The movie was snubbed, probably, because it did not settle well with viewers. That is not to say that it was a terrible movie, but a movie isn't just a beginning. It has a middle and an end. The main character, as poetic as he was, wasn't exactly the deepest pool of acting ability. The actress is brilliant and her pain was unbearable, so much so that I despised renting the movie because of how she ended up. The title and art showed none of that. It gave no absolution, which, if done right can work, but it wasn't done right here. I think the snubs are obvious and for good reason. The movie did not work as it was filmed. Real life or not. And I highly doubt that the academy or any other group had an agenda against it. The contrary, it seems like the kind of film that high brow drama lovers would hail. I wanted to, I really did, but in the end I realized that the movie did not deserve my praise and the ending just pissed me off. Not because of how he died but because of how it played out.

reply

Oh, pendergast, I'm aghast. As learned as you appear to be, I really must tell you that it is not just I who violently disagree with you about the quality of this film, it is a vast majority of critics.

"The movie was snubbed, probably, because it did not settle well with viewers." Also not true. Many, most, people who have seen it agree with the critics. It didn't have a huge paying audience, but that is not the same as saying it wasn't well received, just overlooked.

"...it seems like the kind of film that high brow drama lovers would hail. I wanted to, I really did, but in the end I realized that the movie did not deserve my praise and the ending just pissed me off. Not because of how he died but because of how it played out." That is so rich. REALLY, Mr. Keats, the circumstances surrrounding your death do not please the aesthestic of pendergast.

"You have love being denied or walked away from or forced into exile, but this movie failed in how it resolved or canceled the love. The ending left a bad taste that completely burned most of the beauty from the minds of viewers." Well, perhaps it did with you, but for me and everyone else I've discussed with and written about this film, the ending only underscored the beauty of Fanny's and Keats' love.

Perhaps I am a product of modern paranoid times, but the marked neglect of this film by the awards societies has the whiff of a smell of preordained planning. That's the only way I can resolve the injustice.



"I'd never ask you to trust me. It's the cry of a guilty soul."

reply

The movie was snubbed, probably, because it did not settle well with viewers." Also not true. Many, most, people who have seen it agree with the critics. It didn't have a huge paying audience, but that is not the same as saying it wasn't well received, just overlooked.
Actually, I think most people found the film dry and poorly paced - don;t get me wrong, it was OK, but certainly not a masterpiece. It was typical of a BBC production

----------------------------------------
I don't know what it is, but its weird and pissed off!

reply

"...it was OK, but certainly not a masterpiece. It was typical of a BBC production"

So you have said, I think three times in the last 15 minutes. You do know that, for one, this was not a BBC production? Some BBC work has been stunning. But this film is exquisite and really beyond them. Just a lovely gem.


"I'd never ask you to trust me. It's the cry of a guilty soul."

reply

Give me a break pendergast. This was a critically acclaimed film. The majority of critics praised it up one side and down the other. Of course no film is absolutely perfect and there are heaps of films that are much better than those that were nominated for awards out there that did not get nominations. Obviously the film did not sit well WITH YOU and you act like in your reply that you have all the answers and you don't. How did you expect reality to 'play out'? Indeed the film ended the way it should have. Did you want the film to continue on to show how Fanny mourned for years like a widow or what? You don't really explain how you felt the film might have ended. As far as the ending completely burning the beauty, I frankly don't know what the hell you're talking about. You act like you speak for everyone who saw this movie and you most certainly do not. Leave your pretentiousness somewhere else because it doesn't belong on this board.

I think she's the saddest girl ever to hold a martini.

reply

I love this film. I love it with all my heart.

reply

[deleted]

Hello....as far as the BAFTA awards, I'm glad that Young Victoria received the award for best costumes. Who said anyone OWNED this board? I could care less if you liked this film or not. Not everyone has the refined taste that the viewers who hold it in high esteem have. I hate to disagree with you but this film was critically acclaimed. The majority of the film critics who viewed it thought it was wonderful despite the fact it did not make an awards sweep. As you probably already know, there's lots of good indie films that never make the major awards either. The majority of films that people seem to enjoy are the Ronald McDonald's wasteland of crap. I'm sure you'll be at home there. Oh and yes, the previous poster was pretentious whether you will admit it or not.




I think she's the saddest girl ever to hold a martini.

reply

[deleted]

Since you've already described yourself quite well in your last sentence, I need not reply to anything else you've said here.
Cheers!


I think she's the saddest girl ever to hold a martini.

reply

[deleted]

...ditto as my last statement was as well so the joke's on you!...lol

I think she's the saddest girl ever to hold a martini.

reply

[deleted]

[deleted]

Oh, was that sarcasm, wplains? I thought it was a confession.

"I'd never ask you to trust me. It's the cry of a guilty soul."

reply

Yep!

I think she's the saddest girl ever to hold a martini.

reply

[deleted]

[deleted]

ladymarylasenby,

". . . my anger is more directed at the fact that all the other crap that came out this year should weigh more against it."

Well said.-- enough said.

reply

My point is this (again): this is a movie inspired by a love for the poetry of Keats, as well as the man himself (since the two are inseparable). One has only to read or listen to an interview with Campion when she responds to the questions: why this poet? why this film? to understand this. Therefore, logically, or so it seems, it will only be those viewers of Bright Star who are "members" of the Keats's "Inner Sanctum" who will "get it." If this sounds (intellectually) pompous to some readers/posters, I apologize, but sometimes the truth hurts.

reply

Pendergast 7,

"The main character . . . wasn't exactly the deepest pool of acting ability.""

I'm not sure what you are referring to here, but if it's Whishaw's talents as an actor, you must research him more deeply . . .

reply

I think that part of the reason it was snubbed was because it wasn't marketed to the point of annoyance. Several films this year, while quality, had been over-advertised and much of their original appeal was lost in the process. I'm glad that Bright Star didn't become a promotion whore, but it would've been nice to see it get some of the recognition it deserved, principally for cinematography. It is one of the most visually stunning films I've ever seen.

Decorate yourself from the inside out. -Andrei Turnhollow

reply

Beautiful movie, great acting, great story, great cinematography. Can't believe it was only nominated for costumes....and then lost. The movie was a tribute to Keats. It was golden in every way in my view.

WATCH MY VIDEO - MICK - SECOND CHANCE
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Kcnex-A0O88

reply

[deleted]