The film critic that reviewed the picture with Richard Roeper gave the impression that Yee's penis was on display. Thank God it wasn't true. Seriously, though, excellent film, great performances, and downbeat ending, but who cares? I'll be watching it again soon.
His bollocks were on display, but so what if his penis had been. I think men should be shown more often on film. There's nothing wrong with a man's body. If women are always shown, why not men? Women look just as much as men do.
"Look lady I don't come down to where you work and slap the d!ck out of your mouth".
A couple of my mates went to see Troy opening weekend because they heard it showed Brad Pitt's ass. $10 just to see Brad Pitt's ass seems a bit excessive to me but whatever to each their own.
"Look lady I don't come down to where you work and slap the d!ck out of your mouth".
Well, yeah, but that's Brad Pitt. If it was just some average schmoe on the street, the women could probably ask nicely, and he'd exhibit himself for free (not in every case, mind you! but they wouldn't waste half the night trying to get a free peepshow, as a man would have to do).
And to the OP... seriously? Just because you see a penis does not mean you're going to turn gay.
Proud member of SHREWS (Society for the Honor Required of Eyes Wide Shut)
Girls do look at "regular guys" too. There are websites dedicated to morning boners, guys with camera phones, etc. All of these sites of just pictures of guys with their dicks on display. I don't know if they're just for looks or if women go on them and rate them or leave comments for the guys they like, but they exist.
If we don't believe in freedom of expression for people we despise, we don't believe in it at all.
That's a double standard. I'm not a man but I gotta admit, I'm a little offended by that idea (not your statment). Why should men have to pay, but not women? Men aren't more inclined to show themselves to women just because they're men. I think it's more in a woman's nature to not pay for sex but there are women who do. Maybe it's just a social constraint, I don't know.
If we don't believe in freedom of expression for people we despise, we don't believe in it at all.
Hmm. If a man is canny enough, he can get a woman naked without having to pay. But it must be a social constraint that makes it harder for them to do this. What misery. :D
Proud member of SHREWS (Society for the Honor Required of Eyes Wide Shut)
Girls do look at "regular guys" too. There are websites dedicated to morning boners, guys with camera phones, etc. All of these sites of just pictures of guys with their dicks on display. I don't know if they're just for looks or if women go on them and rate them or leave comments for the guys they like, but they exist. _____
Why would you think that? other than harmless breasts, buttocks, and the occasional pube, women are NEVER shown. For every ten penises in a mainstream movie, you're lucky if you even get a hint of a real vagina. Its a double standard, and women are getting their meat, while men are being used for their penis exposure.
What's with you guys? If the camrea's not giving them a gynecological exam "women aren't really nude".
Nude: 1. naked or unclothed, as a person or the body. 2. without the usual coverings, furnishings, etc. 7. an unclothed human figure. 8. the condition of being unclothed: to sleep in the nude.
Even without the Websters, I consider seeing a woman full frontal without any clothes, nude and never do I see a man full frontally nude (except Ewan McGregor who I respect for always whipping it out because he, unlike men on here, admits that men do not show half of what women show in films).
If we don't believe in freedom of expression for people we despise, we don't believe in it at all