best user review


right here:

Unfocused scripting hinders earnest production every time..., 12 August 2008

Author: MrGKB from Ohio

*** This review may contain spoilers ***

...and "Joshua" is no exception to the rule. Leads Sam "Galaxy Quest" Rockwell and Vera "The Departed" Farmiga turn in respectable work as the harried parents of a brand new colicky baby girl, while newcomer Jacob Kogan achieves decidedly mixed results as the young son suffering from an exceptional sibling rivalry, but documentarian George "Hell House" Ratliff's vision (he co-wrote with tyro David Gilbert) lacks dramatic clarity. Syd Field would not be happy with Ratliff & Gilbert's screenplay. It takes too long to drop the hook, lacks any real tension to be a genuine thriller (despite some refreshingly unsettling music from Nico Muhly and some nice DP work from Benoît "Day Night Day Night" Debie), has little more than a few boo!s in the fright department, and ultimately fails to satisfy with its haphazard thematic explorations and ambiguous (or is it?) ending.

Young Kogan plays a creepy Stepford son gone bad, and is blessed to have the particular musical talent required by the script, but said script makes him more of a McGuffin than a character. He's one-dimensional and mostly inexplicable, so observably "different" that one wonders why his parents haven't noticed how thoroughly different he is from a normal 9-year-old. Then again, the script paints them as fairly lousy parents. The father's a workaholic, the mother's a neurotic mess; the gay uncle's the only family member who can relate to Joshua. It all adds up to one "oh, c'mon!" too many: how did things get to this sorry state in the first place? How has no one noticed just how weird Joshua is? Unfortunately, we never get an answer; Joshua remains an enigma to the end, and as a result, the audience has no sympathy for the beleaguered parents, nor any fears for the oblivious uncle.

With a tighter, more sensible script and better dialog, "Joshua" might well have been a genuine thriller. Ratliff's deliberately oblique direction and writing defang the narrative arc, however, and leave us at film's end wondering, as Peggy Lee once sang, "Is that all there is?"


"Ugh! I don't like this." --Ambrose Bierce

reply

I disagree with this review. Especially the second paragraph. People did notice how "weird" Joshua was, but the reviewer acts like being different from everyone else is a bad thing. I admire people who are different because it shows that they do not care to change just to conform to what others want them to be. Joshua was far more intelligent than other 9-year-olds. He was very mature for his age. I thought he was 12 until they said his age because of how smart he acted. He had his own unique way of thinking about things. He had his own view of the world. There is nothing wrong with that.

Come, fly the teeth of the wind. Share my wings.

reply

the reviewer intentionally put scare quotes around the word,"different," to emphasize the vagueness of the child's outstanding demeanor/behavior-- did not write "weird" just to be clear, that is what you wrote-- and the lack of parental concern, which is an all-too-contrived perfect storm of lazy writing.

your reply seems like a "weird" straw-man argument. that or you lack the slightest bit of reading comprehension.

"Ugh! I don't like this." --Ambrose Bierce

reply

Yes, the lack of parental concern was added as a reason for Joshua's behavior. The mother was too busy concentrating on the new baby to even realize she had a son, and the father tried to be a good parent at first, but then the second things became tough, he turned his back on Joshua and also abandoned him. Joshua was not evil at all. He was just a child who who didn't fit in with the others because he was so intelligent and he just wanted someone to show him that he was cared about which didn't happen. That means the character is more developed and not as simple as a "some psycho kid" like other similar movies. That is why I disagree with the review and feel that the movie was written very well. Since you defend the review ever so passionately, maybe you wrote it on an alternate account. I can't see any other reason for you to get so angry about a review you didn't even write being criticized.

Come, fly the teeth of the wind. Share my wings.

reply

get ready to be ignored, little troll... duplicate account? honestly, i don't even...

"Ugh! I don't like this." --Ambrose Bierce

reply

Well, you made this thread to call attention to that one random review, so it makes sense.

Come, fly the teeth of the wind. Share my wings.

reply