Then you'd have the same ending as 'The Bad Seed' and 'The Good Son'.
Sometimes you need a movie where there isn't nice little wrap up and the bad person gets what's coming to them.
I rather liked it. I've been reading the threads and I see the lines divided by people who sees it one of two ways. Joshua was an evil sociopath who manipulated things to get what he wanted. Or a poor child suffering from neglect who used his genius to get a better life for his sister and himself. He seemed content there at the end but there's still no telling what could happen in the future.
That's the genius of this movie in a way. Some people just associate bad deeds as an act of pure evil, they try to find the reasons for the actions and when they can't or can't find the logic to it it's something only someone who is evil would do. On the other hand you have the other group who can not believe that a child would do that, children=innocence so any bad behavior especially from a child like Joshua (who actually has the mindset of an adult) must have some sort of reason behind it relating to bad parents. They want to blame the parents and say that it was them who made him so distant as they might have only wanted a good trophy son, good to show off their happy life but not much else.
To me it's a mix of both. He wasn't happy with his parents (perhaps they needed some help as his song said) so with his sociopolitical genius he devised a plan for his happiness, his parents sure wasn't the greatest his mother was a nervous breakdown waiting to happen his father was failing at his job I believe, in a way he did a favor to his sister getting her out of there.
Anyhow I still enjoyed an ending like that. No predictable and expect twist just a child prodigy with plan and watching him pull it off.
___________
I'd kill to see a Oz related thread where no one suggest I see Wicked.
reply
share