Typical Sequel Fodder


If you're not expecting this to equal or surpass the original then this film is bearable.

However if after the first one you were left wanting more than you will be disappointed.. as this is just the kind of exercise that kills the likelihood of a trilogy (direct to video award - I wonder why?).

A sequel that leaves you empty - like Jeepers Creepers 2.

---

Defer not unto the evening, that which the morning may accomplish.

reply

[deleted]

Good point, I admit Rollins did a fair job and should have been the only survivor at the end.

---

Defer not unto the evening, that which the morning may accomplish.

reply

[deleted]

It wouldn't be right to compare the two.

Wrong Turn 2 is a completely different movie and Joe Lynch has stated it's a homage to the 80's horror sequels (Evil Dead 2, Texas Chainsaw Massacre 2, The hills have eyes 2) where as Wrong Turn 1 has it's roots more in Hills have eyes, 70's kind of horror.

Anyway I enjoy number two more. The corny acting, the dumb steriotypes and Henry Rollins being a badass!

reply

I'd actually say that this is one of the few sequels which manages to better the original...

The one thing the original has in its favour is the presence of Eliza Dushku!






Do you like having sex? Then DON'T buy a Nintendo!

reply

thisis crap.... i wasted my time

reply

Sorry. Wrong turn2 is the better. I enjoyed this one so much more. Yes, we have stereotyped characters but they are done very well. More action in this one and memorable death sequences.

reply