I have the DVD. I want to know one thing does this movie have explict Sex and nudity? Male or Female? I mean full frontal or partial? I want to watch it with family (Obviously not kids).
Please Reply.
There's one "sex scene" in it - a topless girl gives a guy a BJ, and another one with two cannibals having fun in the woods while the contestants helplessly watch.
As for nudity, it only comes from the same girl who gave head to the guy - she's topless and you see her boobs for a couple of seconds.
That's about it, not that much here.
Thanks man for the reply but I am a bit confused as in IMDB Plot Keywords the words "Masturbation" and "Lesbian" are mentioned. Is there any scene of Male or Female Masturbation or scene having Lesbians?
Please Reply
There is the girl that gives the guy a bj and we see her topless for a bit.
Then there is one of the cannibals in the woods watching the girl on the ground and pleasuring himself. We don't see it, but the girl and the guy she gave a bj to do have sex. We just see if after as she's putting her undwear back on.
Other than that, there is also a scene of two of the cannibals going at it fully clothed in the woods as the others watch. As for the lesbian thing, I don't recall.
Thanks for the reply dear. I ll watch it now.
Your brave I wouldnt watch this with family. The nude scene and her giving a BJ is too much. Plus the cannibals having sex again too much detail.
As for Masturbation one of the cannibals gets excited while watching the girl go topless.
And one character is Lesbian. But she is not involved in the sex scenes.
This is the most moronic post I've yet to read on this site.
I could understand if the movie you had picked were more... ambiguous, but seriously? You're on IMDB asking about sex with this straight-to-video piece of garbage?
First off, how religious/sexually oppressed are you?
Second, why wouldn't you watch a better movie with your family?
http://us.imdb.com/name/nm2339870/
One of the goons masturbates to the BJ girl. I can't remember, but I think she's fully clothed at that point (read: she has a bra and panties on, but nothing else). You don't see him, and it's comical more than anything. There's also a sex scene between two goons. Again, no nudity, but everything else.
As for lesbian, one woman mentions she's a lesbian. I think that's it. IMDb is quite literal in their keywords, so when something says lesbian, it doesn't mean there's lesbian sex; it just means that a lesbian is in it.
As for watching the movie with family, I still wouldn't. Even though there's only two seconds of nudity, there's a lot of suggestion and almost nudity. Plus the gore factor. Not much in the way of good old wholesome family values.
I hoping yer original post was a wind up.
You seriously think that watching murder mutilation and canibalism with family is ok, but a naked woman might be disturbing?
I'm guessing yer american.
*beep* the gun, the nipple is the thing that will corrupt the young.
My lord....
And you're a cocky prick that thinks that all Americans are more afraid of sex than violence...
Let me guess...you're English?
Did I say all Americans? No?
There are a hell of a lot of Americans who are smart, erudite and see the point of what I'm saying. (I'm married to one)
You do obviously.
But I have to say that the only people who seem more worried about nudity than gratuitous violence, death and mutilation seems to be, in general, American.
Tell me I'm wrong.
If you wan't proof you must be the only western nation that will show someone die on primetime news but would never dream of showing a breast.
(And yes I'm English, and I don't believe the English are perfect either, we're probably a tad arrogant) :)
"But I have to say that the only people who seem more worried about nudity than gratuitous violence, death and mutilation seems to be, in general, American."
Or maybe, just perhaps, Muslims?
selective quoting there.
I did also say "Western nation".
We ('Murricans)agree that the censorship is silly and erratic (I just watched this title on SyFy channel. The word "lesbian" was deleted about ten seconds before a long, detailed shot of someone munching on a severed human finger).
BUT, what irks us is that those across the water seem to think that we are directly, personally responsible for the 'morality police', and that they reflect the opinions of the entire society. You hold up the censorship as proof of our prudishness; but ignore that we also made the film in the first place.
We don't receive little cards in the mail asking which body parts are naughty, which words are offensive. We don't find movies listed in the voting booths with check boxes to determine the rating for each. The films arrive pre-sanitized.
Yes, we could probably protest and write letters and such-or we could simply shrug and shake our heads and carry on with more important matters.
CLEVER SIGNATURE QUOTE
But the original poster is not asking because of the 'morality police', is he?
So I find it quite legitimate to question this strange attempt to protect the family from nudity while watching a splatter film about incestuous cannibal rednecks.
I'm American and I agree. Generally speaking, sex is still taboo while violence is almost promoted. At Wal-Mart they had shelves full of Sin City the movie but banned Jon Stewart's book America, Democracy inaction because it had faked nude shots of the supreme court members (no pun intended). And yeah, that certainly doesn't sound appealing but you get my point.
shareYou're totally right. We love things to explode....as long as it's not a naked woman.
shareJust a thought, but maybe you should read the entire post before making your own dumb post. The poster said in parenthesis "(Obviously not kids)" so gee, looks like family could mean more than children. It could mean siblings, parents, cousins, etc. I don't know about you, but I find it awfully awkward watching any sort of sex scene with certain family members, but other subjects I'm fine with. It's a matter of personal preference, not corruption of youth. It seems as though you're just reaching for someone to bash rather than exert the brain power required to read 2 whole lines of text.
Despite my kind of a-holish remarks, I didn't mean for it to get to be that big of a deal. I just hate the generalizations that people make regarding people from certain areas. That's like saying it's perfectly acceptable for me to say that all Brits have bad teeth, all French women have hairy legs or armpits or all Candians are afraid of the dark.
shareor all Candians are afraid of the dark
I thought everyone knew that?
How many Canadiens does it take to change a lightbulb?
Oh no guys, who turned out the lights?!
Why don't Canadiens ever get their birthday wish?
Becausw they're too afraid to blow out the candles!
Chickpea981 don't think that proves the point?
You can watch murder, death, mutilation, canibalism with "certain family members" but sex makes you uncomfortable?
Yeah I was being a bit too general. I know its mainly the media pandering to the bible belt lobby.
[deleted]
Are you for real- are your family adults? Who cares and if they do why on Earth are you considering watching a film like this with them? I don't get it.
share[deleted]
[deleted]
So you are OK with cutting heads of with an axe and throwing people in meat grinder with your family but not softcore sex? Zeezus Krizts! The only thing you see there is a woman's breasts and some mutie wanking on them. So I guess it's "safe" to watch with your family!
shareI have to say, the opening post is hilarious!
You are about to watch a horror movie, where you see blood and intestines, babies being fed human fingers, body parts being splashed around and disfigured cannibal mutants killing everything WITH YOUR FAMILY... but you are worried about a masturbation scene, possibly involving (God forbid) lesbians!!!???!
Muhahahaha...... Sorry, nothing more to say!