MovieChat Forums > Epic Movie (2007) Discussion > The first part of the movie was misleadi...

The first part of the movie was misleadingly good



The film began very well. And I remember when I rented this, I paused it after about 15 minutes in to meet up with someone, where I told them this film was surprisingly good. Later I came back and watched the rest to my horror. It went down the drain fast. God awful. Which leads me to believe they were capable of making a better movie, but chose to make garbage instead. The fact that they made money making garbage makes me want to hurt them. Because so many people in this world with much greater talent will die unrecognized, but these ass holes make trash and laugh all the way to the bank.

I was so shocked by the downturn in quality as it descended into nonsense and gibberish that I played the commentary hoping to hear some kind of explanation like they fired the entire crew only days into production. Instead the DVD commentary was just a couple ass holes talking about something that has nothing to do with the film. It was like the craftiest middle finger to the audience I'd ever experienced. I wish painful death upon all involved in this film.

reply

it wasn't good but it wasn't bad either, some few parts were hilarious.

reply

Really, cuz I thought the first part with David Carradine was horrifically bad. It made me a little sick.

reply

I agree it went downhill quick but it was at least slightly amusing even to the end. Still I think it's underrated - I gave it a 5. BINGO WINGS!

reply