by - puschit-1 on Mon May 14 2012 01:43:25
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Once again, english is not my mother tongue.
No need to repeat yourself. I noted this the first time you wrote it. There's nothing wrong with your English. It's actually quite good. There's something wrong with your logic. No matter home many times you stress that English is not your "mother tongue", the hole in your logic will remain just as big.
"Nihilists" is plural, isn't it?
Yes, but when you said, "… they didn't even bother to get somone who can actually speak german fluently," implies that your expectation was that at least one of them could speak German fluently and they did.
So I said "someone" instead of "somebody".
Which neither are plural.
Are you really that nitpicky?
Because I am responding directly to your words should not be a flaw. Taking your words out-of-context should be, which I believe I have not done. You will notice I quote you so you know exactly what I am responding to. If you feel this is "nitpicky", it might be because you are projecting frustration from the subconscious realization that I am making you eat your own words and that your words might be contradictory. You have great English, but someone with terrible English could avoid the direction you have steered this conversation.
And I am not outraged.
But you are the one with the fight-fire-with-fire/two-wrongs-make-a-right/if-one-movie-does-it-then-it's-okay-for-another-movie-to-do-it approach to this conversation. Yeah, you're right, other movies have done it. Does it make it any less of a flaw for
In Bruges to do it? No. Is
The Big Lebowski the best example you could have given? No, it wasn't the best example… it wasn't even a good example.
Iirc you are the one being stirred up a little because of my original comment.
I'm sorry, I don't know what "Iirc" means. I'm as stirred up as you are outraged. Your original comment was inattentive and you have brought very little to the table since. Good day, sir.
Votes: 2053
Reviews: 129 (
http://www.imdb.com/user/ur0756238/comments)
reply
share