MovieChat Forums > L'illusionniste (2011) Discussion > Anyone else just really not like the Gir...

Anyone else just really not like the Girl?


Honestly, he buys her shoes, she wants high heels, he gets her a new coat, she wants a new dress. She was nothing but a spoiled brat!

reply

While the girl's character was not fully fleshed out, I did not see her as a spoiled brat. She is naive and trusting. When we first meet her she is working her tail off at the pub. She is so poor that the soles are coming off of her shoes. She meets the kind illusionist through his work, and seems to genuinely believe that he is able to secure the items of clothing through magic. She is unaware of the reality the situation. She does not see him sneak out to work at night to pay for her needs. When given a chance to do for others, she makes and serves the soup to those worse off than herself. A selfish, materialistic girl would have known there were no magicians, yet the illusionist has to inform the girl of this fact of life.

reply

[deleted]

i get what you're saying too. i actually read up on the film and apparently it was created for a father/daughter relationship more than a couple romance relationship. it definitely made me feel like their relationship was a bit weird but when you think it like a father/daughter relationship, it kind of makes sense to me. in this context, the imdb summary abstract can be misleading haha.

reply

"it definitely made me feel like their relationship was a bit weird but when you think it like a father/daughter relationship, it kind of makes sense to me. in this context, the imdb summary abstract can be misleading haha."

I've found the last couple of posts here very interesting. I thought it was obvious that it was about a surrogate father/daughter-type relationship, but clearly not everyone's seeing that. (And yeah: that IMDB Summary probably doesn't help!)

It's probably not appropriate to go into the details in this thread because anyone just watching the film wouldn't be aware of it (and it's been covered in other threads), but there is a "history" behind Jacques Tati's script, and it was heavily influenced by his own personal life.
Going purely by what's on screen, the final shot of the photo that Tatischeff has been carrying-around with him is meant to be the big "reveal": we realize it's of his daughter. Like so many real-life Variety performers, Tatischeff has swapped a family life for a life on the road. Alice's sudden appearance provided him with the possibility of regaining that family life, and she became a surrogate daughter.

There is perhaps something-else to consider: the original script for this film is over 50 years old. Maybe it just comes from a more "innocent" time, and modern audiences are inclined to go beyond that father/daughter relationship and see connections that weren't originally intended?

reply

[deleted]

still doesn't make up for the fact that she mooched off him throughout the whole movie. She was a prostitute selling companionship instead of sex.

It doesn't matter if the script is 50 years old, the audience isn't form 50 years ago. The director should have made it more contemporary. Going by your post it seems this movie was meant to have a niche audience, in which case it did that extremely well.

reply

haha I just simply find this comment funny because it's a very logical viewpoint albeit harsh.

reply

i found myself being very annoyed by her constant requests and when she just took the white shoes he bought her without waiting the be given them. but by the end i was happy that she found love and saw her previous actions as naive.

"gentlemen make your lives extraordinary"

reply

but by the end i was happy that she found love and saw her previous actions as naive.


Ladies and gentlemen, this is what I call character progression.

reply

I took it to mean that she thought he had magical powers in everything.

In other words, she first thought he could repair the child's doll. Then he "magically" replaced her old shoes. Then she thought he could magically make train tickets appear (which he in fact made it look like)

After all that, she probably thought (like most kids think of their fathers) that he could provide whatever she needed, and it would be absolutely no trouble, no expense.

Just magic. And this is the illusion he WANTED to provide for her, to make her life more exciting than his old, dull & dreary reality.

Her's is quite an innocent outlook, and a major component of the film, with he being the jaded old man who had come to see absolutely NOTHING magical or exciting about life.
- Like most fathers do at some point later in life.

There is even a scene in the middle, where he sees a "job opening" sign on the outside of a theatre, but tells her to go off down the block before grabbing that sign off the building.
- and note that he doesn't just buy her the heels, he leaves them in the room for her to find, in a pretty box with no note. Magic!

In other words, he wants to maintain the illusion as much as she wants to believe it. It gives HIM something to live for. Again, like most fathers with their young kids.

And the point of her eventually wanting heels & a nicer dress is that "his little girl" was growing up. (sped up in time, to fit an 80 minute metaphor.) As time goes by, she starts to see through his ruse, to understand what his life is really like, etc.

If you missed all this, then what film did you see?

reply

the point of her eventually wanting heels & a nicer dress is that "his little girl" was growing up. (sped up in time, to fit an 80 minute metaphor.) As time goes by, she starts to see through his ruse, to understand what his life is really like, etc.



Not to be a nitpicking ninny, but by all accounts they could have at least shown some progression (for the audience's sake) to make it appear as if time had gone by to give the impression that she was "growing up". Maybe a season or two where they spent time together and he eventually ended up working the multiple jobs and attempting to provide her with whatever she wanted.

Within the context of their poignant, albeit short, relationship the only thing most people would gather is that she wanted a lot, gave very little in return and drained that poor 'ole sap dry of both merit and money.


And pardon my American stupidity for not seeing through the pretension to gather the culturally artistic flavors of silent but profound character progression in this beautifully animated yet short-on-story film.

reply

hmmph, yeah so now that guy can go broke by her endless requests.. :p

reply

How do you gather that she saw her previous actions as naive?

reply

The missing part of the puzzle is that she doesn't understand that she's 'mooching'. She doesn't understand what things cost (which you see when she tries to buy jewelry with coins) she thinks he can make money with magic (hence "magicians do not exist").

She's just naive - she grew up in the middle of nowhere - and ignorant of the real world. She wasn't selling her companionship, she thought she was traveling with this marvelous magician who would just give her anything she wanted. And he did, never having the heart to tell her otherwise, although he tried once at the fish and chips shop.

I didn't like her either until that moment at the jewelry counter when it all sunk in. She's seeing a different world than you or I are -- She's the traveling companion of a 'real' magician out in the big world.

reply

She's Mother Teresa compared to my ex-wife.
Actually, Charlie Manson is Mother Teresa compared to my ex-wife.

reply

She truly believes that Tatischeff is able to secure these things through magic. She's not being selfish or greedy, though it at first appears that way, she just doesn't get it. Alice has probably been working most of her life, getting room and board in return for her services. She doesn't really know the value of anything nor even that these presents cost anything for Tatischeff. She only realizes when she reads the note, though she gets a little wake up call when she tries to buy the pearl necklace for the coin she had. She's naive, probably not well educated, certainly not at all worldly. I don't blame her for accepting these things from the illusionist and expecting more, because she's ignorant of the reality of the situation. She's just a innocent child, really.

reply

^ That, too. (Good observation.)

Her living on a Scottish Island is kind of a metaphor for a child that has not yet been out of the house much.

---------------------

One more observation, for those that actually didn't understand the whole point:

Near the end we see the girl-woman meet a tall & handsome young man. They will obviously fall in love & she will have less need for the magician/father. She will need her freedom.

In the very next scene, the magician lets his rabbit go free.
------------

And PLEASE tell me you understood his final scene on the train, with the little girl and the pencils, yes?

reply

She truly believes that Tatischeff is able to secure these things through magic.
Right; that’s why when she was on the train and was asked for her ticket, she motioned to Tatischeff to conjure one up.

--
Synetech

reply

I think a part of it is that she probably thinks the man is wealthy. If you look at the way she was living, the girl was flat out poor working as a bar maid. The man buys him shoes, gives her an entire bedroom, performs shows that always have his fancy poster on the outside, and then he buys her a dress with matching shoes.

So I agree. She was naive and stupid, mooching off of a old man. What she didn't see was that he worked his ass off to get her all those luxuries. That he couldn't afford to buy his own food and he was being cut out of the entertainment world by the rise of rock and roll.

In the end, I think she does understand, or at least we as an audience hope she does as she begins the rest of her life with someone that could be her husband. The old man gives up as a magician and we see a picture of his daughter. It makes me think if the girl was his actual daughter in a way. In the photo she had the same flowers that keep popping up, but this an ambiguous film and so I do think it was left for the audience to decide.

reply

Anyone else read the book 'The Giving Tree' growing up?

I felt that the Illusionist's relationship with the girl is kind of like that story, and much like many of our own (we never really know how much our parents go through to try and provide for us).

I could imagine some people using his kindness as an example to 'get something' from her, but through Chomet and Tati, it becomes something mentally deeper and more innocent.

I also found it a little interesting that the rabbit seems dead-set in its ways- it never stops wanting to nip people. Kind of like Bruno the dog in 'Triplets of Belleville,' where he never got over his phobia of moving trains.


"Thanks, guys." "So long, partner."

- Toy Story 3 (9/10)

reply

She is naive and thinks he can just create money out of thin air using magic.
That's why he leaves her the note saying that magic is not real.

reply

[deleted]


It didn't really see her as bad. If you have children, the relationship between the illusionist and the girl is much like that of parent and child.


In Kidman's case, it's nice to see her lately immovable forehead participating in her performance - Rabbit Hole Review, Variety

reply

[deleted]

yes she was very naive.
but what bothered me the most was that ALL SHE WANTED was going window shopping like a boring generic woman, and it seems that she didn't have ANY interest in accompanying her 'beloved' father figure to actually sit and watch his acts, giving him some warm support. she didn't really give a *beep* about him.
maybe her character was written to flat and black/white to today's standards?

anyway, i hope her future husband will keep up with her growing thirst and endless future shopping sprees. he will have to get 3 jobs :P

about the lost daughter- maybe she's dead? any ideas?

reply

I didn't like her as well. Seemed like she had no gratitude for the old man.

reply

^ Kids never appreciate their parents.

reply

Having worked and being poor, you'd think she'd see that the old man was giving her things, and that she'd know you have to work hard to have things, since she had very little to begin with. It's not like they didn't have shops on the Scottish Isle... In reality, people who have LOTS of money truly feel they can have things 'just like that'. Poor people understand the economics of the situation and have to budget to have anything nice.

She had the only bedroom to herself, while every night he slept on the couch. A non-entitled person would offer to trade off at least so he wouldn't have to always sleep on the couch (a couch 4 feet shorter than he stands...)

The fact she runs off with a dude, doesn't seem to think of the material things the old man worked hard to give her. She only thinks of making her own situation better and disregards the effort others may do for her. They never explain where she gets ingredients for the soup... Regardless, now she can sponge off this young guy. Perhaps you could see it as her 'trading up'.

The fact she didn't understand he had to work doesn't make sense in any other way. If she was grateful, she'd have understood a lot sooner what was going on. Willful ignorance. The fact they aren't romantically involved doesn't really change the fact she imposed herself on him.

There are guys who really are nice people who like to do things to make people happy. Then there are those who are parasites and take until it no longer suits their needs, then move on thanklessly.

reply

All of this ^. Thank you. I know she's meant to be seen as 'naive', but she came off as entitled, blind, unappreciative and stupid. How could she not see that he was struggling?? Where was all the luxury if he was really someone with magical powers? She was an idiot with no sense of understanding. She might have been affectionate but she was a mooch.
I also don't see how people believe she improved at the end. ALL we saw is her essentially ditching one man for the next. She didn't even show a complete realization when her coin was rejected at the jewelry store.

reply

a lot of people here are using the term naive for what is clearly a simpleton. the film makers left it far too ambiguous as to the nature of their relationship and this left her as a very unsympathetic character.

reply