MovieChat Forums > A Thousand Words (2012) Discussion > For those of you who hate Murphy... Here...

For those of you who hate Murphy... Here's my favorite quote from him.


in an interview in 2002 he said

"Every bad decision I've made has been based on money. I grew up in the projects and you don't turn down money there. You take it, because you never know when it's all going to end. I made Beverly Hills Cop III because they offered me $15 million. That $15 million was worth having Roger Ebert's thumb up my ass."

So yes, he's in it for the money, so what. Tell me you wouldn't do the same if you were in his shoes.

reply

Well, you've gotta respect his honesty. And I must admit that many of the nameless and very poor strangers on IMDb speak too quickly about the things stars do for a quick and easy paycheck.

There's only one party worse than this: the Donner party-and they had better food!

reply

There's no point in being broke if you don't have to be. Some say sellout. I say smart.

reply

Racism must pay really well then since I see underlying racial statements all over this ... otherwise good movie.

reply

hahaha what a legend! isnt sam jackson honest about stuff like that too? fairplay to them

reply

Call him what you want, but you won't call him broke. I can't knock it.

reply

But if he chose more wisely his projects, his asking price would keep going up, up and UP $$$$$$$$$$$... but right now he's box office poison, so such short-sightedness has actually ruined long term opportunities of making MORE money...

reply

It was either last year or 2010 he was the 3rd highest paid actor in the world. But I will agree that if his pictures were better he could command an even higher price.

Either way he's not going to be hurting for money any time soon.

reply

pmsl - he says its coz he's from the projects.
He's been living in decadence for more years than he's been living in the projects! I appreciate the honesty but don't give us 90% of it - at least admit you've got used to the plush lifestyle and you're just greedy. And before you say anything - yes I'm jealous.

reply

I do admire his honesty; at least he isn't trying to blame being forced to do it because of some contract or that script changes made the movie crappy or that he is trying to do something new and had to do a crappy film to prove he could do it.
But as you agitated squirrel notes, there comes a limit. $15 million is enough to live a nice lifestyle without ever having to work again and that is just from one movie. I do get that growing up in poverty is going to affect your view and habits regarding money. However, he has been wealthy for decades so somewhere along the line he may have needed a dose of reality about how to manage his money. Perhaps he simply has the Nouveau Rich mentality of spending it while you got it then keeps having to make more to pay for his lavish ways. But since he keeps needing to put on a fat suit to make another dozen million then I'd say either he can never have enough money or he doesn't care a fig about his professional respect but will do what he wants. At least he is honest about his values and doesn't try to play the artistic credibility card. He'd probably do the same thing if he was a banker or a doctor or a car salesman- it isn't about the job but whatever earns the most money.

reply

all very true, however Hollywood can mess with a person's head and their perspective.
For one thing, he wouldn't have seen that $15 mill. First you need to deduct all the federal and state tax which would be, what?, 40, 50%? That's $6, $7 mill gone already.
Then there's his managers fees which is 10% of gross, so that's another $1.5 mill plus the amount he'd normally get p/year.
On top of this he needs to pay for his entourage: publicist, trainer, home help, driver, secretary, dietitian etc etc. Sure, you and I can say most of them aren't needed but this is Hollywood where poverty (in that not being able to afford everyone that is expected of a major Hollywood star) shows weakness and a sign that they're on their way down - a self-fulfilling downward spiral as this would mean no movie studio would want them. Paying all these people - and they'd be asking a lot working as they are for a 'major' Hollywood actor probably sets him back another mill or 2 a year.
And of course we need to add in the cost of living in Hollywood - being seen out and about at the 'right places' in the most expensive clothes. Again, if you want to keep your profile high this is a must. Another couple of hundred thou a year there. Maybe more.

Basically from that $15mill, you might see $4 or $5 mill of that. True, to us mere mortals that's a fortune and enough to keep us safe and sound the rest of our lives but again, this is Hollywood. To stay up amongst the A-list celebs, you'd need to spend $2 or $3 mill a year. Great while you're earning but only while you're earning. A couple of duds or simply the studios deciding you're not 'in' anymore and you might go 2 or 3 years without earning anything, all the time still spending like you are. Also, you'd be surrounded by sycophants all telling you how great you are, and how you'll be back on top in no time all the while leeching money off you. This would seriously screw with your perspective.
Look at John Travolta. He was huge in the late 70s, early 80s and could command his own fee. By the mid-90s his star had waned so much he agreed to Pulp Fiction for a pittance of $140,000. That movie was all it took to catapult him back onto the A list of course but at the time he wouldn't have known that.

Plus you would become accustomed to living in that style. Everyone does, not just movie stars. We all think if we were earning, say, $50k more a year, we'd save the lot but it doesn't happen. We adjust our spending to our earnings, and it's very difficult to adjust them back down if and when our income drops. That's why there's so many credit card debtors and bankrupts around right now.

In summary, it's a lot of money to us but it probably wouldn't go far in Hollywood which is why people like Murphy keep acting. At least he's honest about it, much like Michael Cain who has said much the same in explaining some of his movie choices (Jaws 3D the most obvious) though in less graphic terms.

reply

Everyone in this post seems to automatically exaggerate the depravity of acting in a crappy movie. Since when is participating in a crappy movie like selling your soul to the devil? What do any of you guys do for a living that is so noble as to makes poor acting so sinister?

reply

He takes the money then bankrupts his audience. Not too nice a deal for his fans who walk out of the theater feeling Eddie took the money and we got taken.

The guy still cracks me up though.

As an apologist turned authority I don't defend my comments because I am always right.

reply

Well, after making that $15 million why not just live on that and only do the good scripts. It sounds kinda greedy to me. It's one thing to get the offer, the other is to accept it.

reply

He's honest, but what he's saying is b.s. He could make a killing AND make good movies. He chooses to make turds. Nick Nolte told a story of Murphy walking up to him 10-15 years ago and saying something like, "I'd like to make the kind of movies you make (those that get critical acclaim and are respected). How do you do that?" Nolte told him, "First off, you're not going to make sh*t for $$." Murphy said, "Oh, I can't do it then. I have a lifestyle to which I've grown accustomed."

reply