Unless the information I looked up is false, Henry is listed as being born in 1491 and Catherine in 1485 which would make them only 6 years apart in age. It's only 3 years less than 9, yes, but in fairness to the person who started this thread, the age difference between Henry and Catherine definitely appears to be more than 6 years, if you go solely based on the appearance of the actors portraying them that is.
I think the actress portraying Catherine looks a bit older than her real age.
But then to play Devil's Advocate, not a single actor or actress in this series was meant to be an exact replica of the historical person they were supposed to portray. For example, I don't think Catherine had black hair and was actually more blonde.
I just thought of something else too; I think this is the first historical TV drama where time is put on fast-forward. Events that happened over a span of around 30 years are crammed into about 30 episodes. And if you pay attention to the timeline, you'll find yourself watching one episode where several events happen, and then the next episode features events that happened several months (or even years) later. Like with how Princess Mary is a small child at the beginning of the series, but by the time Catharine dies she appears to be in her teens. By the end of the events in the last episode of the series, Mary is supposed to be in her 30's. Two or three episodes are meant to cover several months/years of activity, you know?
So maybe that's why Catharine appears to be so much older?
I don't know, I'm just spit balling. . .
reply
share