I'd like to think she was. For her to compromise her immortal soul by telling such a huge lie when marrying Henry, to risk her titles, her daughter's legitimacy, her marriage, EVERYTHING she had...then insisting upon it for TEN YEARS (seven while the divorce proceedings were "not proceeding", and three more after that) under a huge amount of pressure, that's an awfully big thing to hide if it wasn't true.
However, I'm going to play devil's advocate here. Ludlow Castle in the middle of winter (which is where Catherine and Arthur went right after they wed) is not the most happening or exciting place. Ludlow is a small town, even today, and in 1501, it would have been pretty isolated from any of the "goings on" that the two of them would have been used to at Henry VII's court. So, if the two of them felt they were in the middle of nowhere in the dead of winter with nothing to do (not that I think there's nothing to do in Ludlow, but the two of them might have)....that kinda begs the question of what, exactly, the two of them WERE doing if they weren't getting it on with each other. And Catherine's life, during the time when she was Arthur's widow, totally sucked. She had no money, no real status that got her anywhere, and no one really cared about her -- not Henry VII, not her father, no one. It's entirely possible that Catherine simply lied about what happened just to get out of her sucky life at the time....and once she started, she just had to maintain it.
BUT, I would like to think she was honest, and that there was no consummation between her and Arthur.
reply
share