I mean it seems like nobody likes this movie, but I thought it was great. Other than the random romance (which I will admit it was dumb and pointless)I thought it was fine, I mean it's no Lord of the Rings by far but I think it's underated, along with LWW. The scores are only 7.0 for LWW and 6.9 PC. By the way I read the these two books and I thought they were fine adaptaions. I'm not one of the people who wants the movie to go 100% faithful, I just ask that it keeps the spirt of the book and some parts of the book in the movie.
-FOR ASLAN!!! -The romance -final battle scene was a bit too much, tried to top the first one when they should have done something else, too lord of the rings like -the scene where susan falls two feet? what the hell was the point of this? - the night raid scene was different in the book. It was a battle in the forest and they messed up because a giant gave them away, and this was before the pevensies meet up with them -2.5 hours is something i don't mind, but I felt it was too long
Things for it
- the resurrection of the white witch - Peter / Miraz duel
-for aslan!!! I thought the line was "for narnia" but I haven't seen it for a while so I could be wrong
-the romance yeah that was dumb and pointless
-final battle scene was a bit too much, tried to top the first one when they should have done something else, too lord of the rings like I liked the battle scene, I thought it fun and cool, I didn't see much lord of the rings in it.
-the scene where susan falls two feet? what the hell was the point of this? oh I don't know about that
- the night raid scene was different in the book. It was a battle in the forest and they messed up because a giant gave them away, and this was before the pevensies meet up with them like I said before I don't need the movie to go 100% and besides I think this shows the stuggles of narnia better
-2.5 hours is something i don't mind, but I felt it was too long I thought it was fine
- the resurrection of the white witch yeah I thought that was a good scene
- Peter / Miraz duel that was a really well thought out scene and very good indeed
"the scene where susan falls two feet? what the hell was the point of this?"
While I disliked the movie, let me just say that Susan would have fallen farther had Trumpkin not caught her and swung her over to the ledge.
Things I disliked:
Peter fighting at the beginning Peter's attitude throughout Trumpkin's attitude after being saved the castle raid. This showed Peter as a terrible leader and Caspian as willing to allow vengeance to cause him to forget his duties.
They had to change the order of the scenes. I doubt that they could ever have made a successful adaptation that stayed with the original sequence. That would have required half the movie to proceed in flashback, as Trumpkin brought the Pevensies up-to-date on how the adventure got started.
Also: yes, I thought that Peter and Caspian both suffered in the abortive castle raid. But that had to happen, too, in order to make the story believable. Both boys--and they *were* boys--had to grow up. Furthermore, Caspian needed a motive to muck around with a werewolf, a hag, and Queen Jadis, and Peter needed to be brought up short so that he could realize how mistaken he had been--and agree to send Lucy to get through to Aslan.
The one thing I've noticed, though, is that Susan is already shaping up to be a much stronger character in this film arc. Are they shaping up to bring her back as a friend of Narnia in LB?
No, they can't do that. If they ever get to make the Last Battle I expect Susan's story to remain but be embelished slightly to give it more reason that it got in the book.
I thought PC was fine really, it was a difficult book to bring to the screen and they did ok. I would have dropped the silly romance - fine ok Caspian may have had a thing for Susan but if they had stuck to the book they should have left her indifferant to his advances which would have worked better.
My big problem with PC was the character development (or lack of it) Edmund was absent for much of the film and he should have been used more and it was lacking in any kind of emotion for the most part. For example after the badly done falling off ledge moment we should have seen the Pevensies giving each other slightly more interaction maybe an 'are you ok' gesture rather than just charging off into another battle.
Yeap, thats the question michael-colan.. Why all the hate?, since the very begining, thats the question. I´ll never get that.
Fully agree with tevery world you said. I love this movie and find no reason for saying this is bad.
But honestly, in every single board all you see if how terrible and bad movies are... so Thats why I dont care at all every body says this movie or that movie is the worst thing ever done. And if you like the movie, so you are retard, idiot, childish or whatever...
I really wonder what the hell people do watching movies. I just love movies I dont care about anything else
I get what yall are saying about the Lord of the rings. It felt a little bit of it in there. But IDC i thought this one is better than LWW.
Ok so I had watched LWW. I couldn't even watch the movie TBH. I thought it was stupid and BORING. I watched PC, and i loved this one better than the first. Just saying. Maybe im a sucker for alot of fight sence. Idk. But i enjoyed this one better than the first.
<3 Jess
'Why didn't you come before she ripped my door off' Nick 'You owe me a granberry juice' Kevin
No offence, but if you think there's litterally no' one who likes this movie, then you haven't done your research enough. If nobody liked it, why do you think this movie had such a high rating here on Imdb? Many good user reviews? Several good reviews in general? Although there has been some bad, but not that this movie has been overwhelmed with bad reviews.
Speaking for myself, I enjoyed "Prince Caspian" most of the part, but there were some part who could've been better. It's long time since I last saw it, but I found many of the scenes boring and generic. Most dissapointing was the ending, though.
But the film did had it's moment, as the opening and the battle sequences.
Just saw this again on Encore. My biggest peeve is that we saw a bunch of scenes of them building the wood bridge during the beginning and middle of the movie that really weren't necessary and just wasted time. I don't think we would have lost any meaning seeing the bridge for the first time at the end. In particular, the kids want to cross the river, Lucy sees Aslan, then they go over to see people building a bridge, then they go back to the same river and Lucy slips but she's okay and they can cross the river after all. Why couldn't Lucy have just seen Aslan and then slipped and they cross the river without the extraneous scene?
The other thing is that the Encore tv was in the standard def channel so it was presented in a 4:3 standard format. And you know what, not only did it look fine but there were many shots that I thought seemed perfectly composed for a 4:3 ratio. Yet the dvd is 2.40:1 and there is no full screen dvd. So why shoot the movie that way if it's going to only be available in the very wide format? It just seems strange?