it lacked something HUGE. . .something was missing to give it that great "departed" feel, but i can't place it. . .anyone kno that could help me out?
i personally think that it was the timing that ruined it, i mean, everything felt rushed, and i'm not talking about the quantity, how it's almost 2 hours and a decent lengthed movie, no, the QUALITY itself felt rushed, everything was out of order. . .
what do u guys think was lacking?
"Sic Vis Pacem Parabellum-If You Want Peace, Prepare For War. . ."
my wife and I just watched it and only half-an-hour in we both agreed something was missing; I thought the movie should have opened with the two brothers as kids, say about 10 or so, just playing or something, because the movie is about two brothers but we only see two guys, not the real kinship that should be felt, hell, there was more kinship between bobby and fredie; also, the apparent ease bobby has in the police world though he is neither a part of it and did not go to the police academy- I am sure there would be considerable reluctance on the part of most of the cops to work with this untrained rookie or answer any of his many questions that weren't asked.
It is interesting to see that reasonably good writing, story, scrpt, dialogue, acting, cinematography, directing etc. don't make a very strong movie; I've felt a lot more wow from lesser movies
I watched this movie last night and thought it was a decent movie. I had no expectations, so I wasn't disappointed. i thought Joaquin Phoenix was quite believable in his situation. Mark Wahlberg was a little flat and unlikeable. Rober Duvall was excellent, as usual. However, I thought I'd comment on YOUR following comment:
"the apparent ease bobby has in the police world though he is neither a part of it and did not go to the police academy- I am sure there would be considerable reluctance on the part of most of the cops to work with this untrained rookie or answer any of his many questions that weren't asked."
Bobby probably grew up at the police department since his father was the chief of police. Therefore, all the cops had to have known him . . . maybe not necessarily liked or trusted him, but they knew him and his background.
I expected someone to say that; it's an easy way out...if he were so well known to the police community it surely would be something known to the underworld as well. Besides, do you think cops bring their kids around on stakeouts ? I gathered that as a child bobby blamed the father for always being a cop at work, absent husband and dad, losing his mother and would have nothing to do with cops period- that is why he choose another line of work and went into it with his mothers maiden name. he did not sit around at bbqs listening to cops talk shop- he went off on his own, resentful if anything for the work his dad choose over his family; therefore, the familiarity he has as a cop is contrived- it just doesn't fit.
u do raise a good point, but I think that the way that the director introduced the characters as adults helped to add to the image that they were distant even though they were family. They both lived different lives and chose that willingly; by introducing not showing their past together it seems to leave the speculation to the audience as to why they are having so many issues and chose to lead different lives.
Another thing I just thought of is that possibly by keeping the two brothers' past vague it would leave more opportunities open for the plot later on in the movie if their was too much detail as to why they chose those two different lives then it would be alot harder to write a change of concious into the characters.
I am not sure but I too was dissatisfied. I watched it this weekend and I had seen about 4 movies this weekend so I was looking for a good "cop drama" movie to sink my teeth into.
It left me feeling as if it was just another typical 2 brothers who can't get along, one is a cop, the other has a problem with drugs, the Father who loves them both (at the end) then there was that flimsy @$$ plot... WTF? I wanted to care about it... I wanted them to give me some reason as to WHY and what was so different about the Russian Mob... but it was just FLAT. I have the mad hots for Joaquin & never to impressed with Mark Wahlberg but still come on Robert Duvall, Eva Mendes I was thinking this should be somewhat engaging right...
NO it wasn't not when at the end of the movie when the credits are rolling you are wondering what was the purpose of that?
It lacked that great performance to center the film. Phoenix did well as Bobby, but a large part of the film he was just quietly brooding. I also think if they would have expanded Duvall's character and made him a "bigger" character, we would have had a better feel for the family structure. As it was, I didn't get a sense that these people were a family the way I felt the Corleone's were.
I also think the ending was a letdown, despite the reasoning Gray has for it on the commentary.
No need to apologize Irishaspaddyspig such is why we rent movies we don't get to like them ALL out of a weekend where I watch 6 movies I didn't think they were all going to be good experiences =}
I am looking forward to what ever else Joaquin decides to portray he has not lost me.
See, I thought Phoenix was brilliant. Even when he does mediocre films, he never ceases to be consistently engaging and believable, this film was no exception. He was the sole actor/character carrying this film and truth told, I can't imagine another actor I find more interesting to watch for two hours. If you really watch him, he is doing so much more than 'quietly brooding,' he's silently acting, conveying inner conflict with a single glance. I haven't seen it done as well since the '50's.
I enjoyed this film, it wasn't meant to be a new, hip cop story. I think it was Rolling Stone whose reviewer said that it's very unhip-ness was a source of it's strength. I liked that this film looked and felt and moved differently than we've seen in a long time. Too many films nowadays are too hyper and fast-moving that their very freneticism is boring. And I must say, I fell in love with this ending. It's simple, moving, and realistic, it's concludes on a grace note, not with another bang.
"Why would a banana grab another banana? Those are the kinds of questions I don't want to answer."
I didn't mean the ending of the story, I know the intent, but I wouldn't even say it was ambiguous, necessarily. I think it's clear that Bobby is a deflated man and while there's hope for him to regain pride that's already lost, he also shows sad resignation to a life he never wanted. You understand what was lost for him to ascend to this position and it's not even something that he wants for himself.
I meant that the literal ending was simple, the quiet exchange of "I love you's" while the camera is flat on their faces--that's the simplicity I meant. It ended at a perfect moment.
"Why would a banana grab another banana? Those are the kinds of questions I don't want to answer."
nah, the ambiguity doesn't come from the fact that he is 'deflated man'--although you would be surprised how many missed it--but more to do with the whole morality behind it. i.e the perils of duty suggested by it. that's what i was referring to.
i agree the ending is effective; i like the way the music just swells and recedes too, adding considerable power to the moment, but the 'i love you exchange' is absolutely loaded, and i would not consider it a 'simple way' to end a film. But i get your point anyway. i'm just fascinated by the idea that a family can be brought together, and then torn apart, because of crime and violence; the idea of brothers teaming up to 'fight crime', and destroying them both in the process, is, at least IMO, a great angle. sure it's not 100% original, but it's rare to see this point of view in films, where the tensions are generally resolved and we assume the characters just go on with their lives, or one of them dies and the impact is lost on the audience because it happens too quickly to register etc etc. i like the sense that there is no real sense of justice at the end, no sense of elation, relief; nothing. it's quite miserable actually.
Doesn't ambiguous mean that it's not black and white? So how can my impression be wrong? I agree this film is underrated by people who don't appreciate the solid story and there's no purpose to debating the "meaning" of the movie. It's sounds like you did some research, so did I, I read everything about this movie before it even came out and am pretty familiar with this director, but even if we have different opinions, in art, that's a fine thing.
The point is made clear, the director has even spoke about it, that Bobby resigns himself to this life he never wanted because it was ordered by fate. That sure there's the respect from his brother and a now gone father, which is something that he's never had before, but Bobby is not a happy man. He in a sense, really had no choice in where he ended.
"Why would a banana grab another banana? Those are the kinds of questions I don't want to answer."
I thought this movie was way better than the Departed. The Departed didn't have that father son and two brother rival thing. I could relate a little more to this than the whole mob thing in the departed. This movie for me was more about family coming together and being there for one another.
I just finished watching as well. Same thing: there was a lot of good there, but something was missing.
I gave it 24 hours and realized what it was: not enough grounding of the relationship between Bobby and the Russian mob family. There were what, maybe 2 scenes where you got the feeling that there was history there? But it was so crammed into those 2 scenes. The movie was not that long (about 1'37", right?) - seems to me there was time to fit in more. Then Bobby's buildup/let down would have been much more believable and moving. As it was, you kinda got that there was something missing in his family that he was getting with the Russians, but you never had the chance to feel it enough.
I also felt that the script lacked a lot of clarity in terms of the theme of selfishness in the family, how it drove them apart, and how Bobby's character was motivated/affected by that. The last scenes should have been really moving — Bobby was, in spite of his heroic efforts — alone and abandoned, again. His brother has decided to leave the force, his father is dead, his girlfriend has split... everything that motivated him to be a hero didn't come through for him, in the end. Can you get sadder than that? It was moving, but you should have been crying at that point... and with the rushed, choppy script, you just weren't emotionally 100% there at that point.
Also: Bobby's father makes references to how 'crazy' he is... would have been good to get more scenes of Bobby as an outsider, black sheep. Would have driven the points above home even more.
I love Phoenix, I'm a huge fan and I've been following his career for a while. I was really happy to see a solid, smooth performance out of him. He's had moments where his character fell down in other films, and for the first time in a long time, he really carried it all the way through. With a better script, this would have been an outstanding performance, I'm sure.
I was going to comment on this, but I agree with almost everything tatacalimera said. This movie did lack something... the good acting didn't make up for the lack of character development. I didn't fully understand the realtionships between Phoenix and his father and brother. I wasn't emotionally involved in the relationships between these people, but I was affected by Phoenix's powerful acting. That's why it felt like it SHOULD be a great movie, but it fell short. There were a lot of things that could have been expanded on, like tatacalimera stated above, and when it was over I was scratching my head searching for substantial meaning or something I could take from a movie that FELT like it had some deeper meaning. This movie was lacking substantial meaning, and that is one of the major differences between this and The Departed (as many people have compared it to). The Departed, among other things, was also about a deflated man who was determined to do what he thought was right despite what it cost him personally. But in The Departed you could experience the personal and psychological turmoil of Leonardo DiCaprio, while in this movie I felt like I was touching the surface of what was actually going on. I wasn't taken anywhere deep, just shown a decent story, and that was all. That's what I think was missing.
^^i get what you mean, but there is no way in hell that 'departed' had more meaning than 'We Own The Night'. that movie was all surface. there is nothing to argue or say about it really. it's almost entirely a plot driven film.
There were 2 scenes that were cut out from the film that might have added a little clarity to both bobby's relationship with the russian family and the use of furs to smuggle the drugs.... these scenes were filmed in my fur store on w. 29th st in the city in the fur district. the film crew rented my store for the day. in 1 scene, there is bobby seeing the father, mother and grandkids in the fur store which would have given a better idea that the mafia kingpin was also a furrier. the second scene was bobby talking with morat in a very intense moment. as stated. both scenes were cut.... i was also hired as an extra to be a fur worker so i was very obviously disappointed that the scenes, that would have made some things a little clearer were no where to be found....
Interesting, I think those scenes might have helped, depending on the dialogue... but it needed even more than that. As I said, at 1'37", they had the time. I'd like to see all the edited scenes, but I have a feeling this movie had major script issues, on top of choppy editing. Or, most likely, the editor just didn't have enough to begin with.
To me, this movie lacked life. The pace was grindingly slow, like rush hour traffic in west L.A. We are led along a path that is not that interesting to begin with, and then expected to be "riveted" by the performances of the cast. Nothing of the sort ever happened for me. I was REALLY disappointed in this movie. I thought it was going to be good. Really a lifeless film. The characters are not likable or really interesting and we never get to know them. The dialogue was subpar.
I wanted to add that I thought duvall's presence in the movie was just half-assed... he tends to play his characters the same way, from the godfather to the killer elite to a family thing and you can add this movie to the list as well- he never surprises you, you never see him and say wow, THAT was robert duvall ?...like sean penn in carlitos way. duvalls acting isn't brilliance, it isn't acting, it is him just saying his lines. droll like a 40watt incandescent bulb, it will do, it does the job, but it hardly a point of brilliance compared to all the other points of light in cinema
I agree, for the most part. In his brief role in Apocalypse Now, I would beg to differ, he brings something a little extra there. His recent performances all fit the bill you describe though. How many times has he played the "tough old cop"???? Which in many ways is just a continuation of the straight laced Tom Hagan.
I enjoyed the movie very much. I had no expectations for the film. So I was pleasantly surprised. I actually didn't like the departed because of the outcome of many of the characters.
This is an original screenplay, not like "The departed". Please, stop comparing every police thriller with "The departed". That movie is not a classic, but a very good version of a better movie. It doesn't deserve, in my opinion, the huge "referential classic" status that some people are giving.