MovieChat Forums > We Own the Night (2007) Discussion > What happened with the gun? (spoilers)

What happened with the gun? (spoilers)


The end, where he says "get on your knees" and gives the other cop the gun. Is that like saying, "say he killed himself", or "kill him"? What the heck was that?

reply

He gave back his "illegal" gun. It signified that he was finished with the job he came to do. He wasn't giving a signal or hint of any kind.

"a malcontent who knows how to spell"

reply

See that doesn't make sense. It's his father's gun, why would he give it away to anyone but his brother?

Here's my reasoning, he is giving it so Marat can be executed with his father's gun. Just look at how the cops all formed the ring around him. That's not normal...that hints to some sort of spectacle that they are about to witness, like an execution. We all know cops get pissed when fellow cop gets killed...imagine what they would do if the deputy chief was killed. Executing him would also be a 'good' reaction for how much of a joke the police were being perceived as, showing to at least themselves that THEY 'own the night'.

reply

He didn't give it back. He gave it up. It was illegal and concealed. He had no reason to use it, anymore. Giving it to the officer signaled the end of the violence. He was no longer bent on revenge.

"a malcontent who knows how to spell"

reply


I think you are right on target. Joaquin may be finished with vengeance("We're done"[my brother and I] is what he said as he handed over the gun) but he knows the friend wants HIS and the force's rectifying/ vengeance. I believe 3 things prove this intent on the director's part: The ring of officers; the "Get down"- making Marat kneel down; and the providing of his murdered father's gun. With the latter two ,Joaquin has set up the action to follow, only he doesn't participate in that action.











Ad hoc, Ad loc, Quid pro queeee,
So little time and so much to see!

reply

Damn... Could not have said it better myself.

reply

i couldnt make out what he said when he handed off the gun, so the whole time he was walking to the car to see his brother, i expected to hear a gunshot.
still a great film

reply

He said, "We're done here". That didn't require further action by the cops.

"a malcontent who knows how to spell"

reply

My take on the finale is that Green orders Marat to his knees to set up his execution but not to conduct it.
Instead, he hands the revolver to his father's assistant (with the silent implication that HE should shoot Marat) and then walks away.
If I had directed that scene, I would have inserted the sound of a gun shot as Green walks away, to tell the audience that justice had been done. Then, perhaps we could hear the audio portion of some radio or TV newscast saying that Marat "was killed by the police while trying to escape" or "while presenting armed resistance" or some such plausible explanation.
That way, there would be no uncertainty over the meaning of the last scene and the plot would be wrapped up nicely.

reply


yep, tremas, we're on the same bus.






The way to have what we want
Is to share what we have.

reply

When Bobby gave that other guy the gun, I initially thought he intended to have Marat shot with it, but then he said, "I'm done" or something like that and I realized he was just giving the gun back.

However, I do wonder if the intension was also to have Marat think, if ONLY for a second, that he was about to be executed. I kind of got that vibe since the focus switched from the gun to Marat at least once during that scene.


*´¨)
¸.·´¸.·*´¨) ¸.·*¨)
(¸.·´ (¸.·´ElaineR

reply

i think that it was to signify to marat that he could have killed him, but chose the 'better path' and didnt. i dont think any of the police officers would have seen anything against that, seeing as what marat had done to bobbys family.

just my idea of it

reply

Unless I missed something, it was his fathers gun and he gave it up because he couldn't bring himself to kill his "second father" Marat as he had (in his own mind) already killed his fathers muderer. He passed the gun to his fathers best friend so he could shoot him with it. It was symbolic that Marat should die from the gun of the Police Chief who had been shot on Marats own orders. He was still coming to terms with not only losing his real father, but finding out that Marat was so deeply involved in the drugs and that he ordered the hits on the police. So in effect he actually felt like he had lost two fathers and also as mentioned above all his friends and his girlfriend.

reply

Not... He gave the gun up because, as he said, "We're done here". He was finished. The gun was illegal for him to carry. When he gave it up, he gave up his bloodlust. He became an officer rather than a vigilante. There was no implication to kill Marat.

"a malcontent who knows how to spell"

reply

"He was finished. The gun was illegal for him to carry. When he gave it up, he gave up his bloodlust. He became an officer rather than a vigilante"

Yeah I see that, definitely. I agree he then went from vigilante to police officer. I just thought the connection with the gun being his fathers and the ring they formed around Marat was symbolic of all the officers wanting to witness his demise, and again, symbolically with the gun of the Police Chief he had ordered murdered.

I know there was no implication to kill Marat, I just think it was left ambiguously, as most clever endings are. I will have to watch it again soon and see if I can pick up on anything I missed.

But I love the ending and love the fact it left me thinking about it for a while afterwards. Great film, and good to see everyones view on it as well.

reply