Coats made of coke. WTF?
Pretty much as re - fu -ckin - diculous as it gets. An insult to the intelligence of a beer can. How does that crap make it through the final cut? I mean......it doesnt get worse than that....ever....anywhere......ever
shareThis is, according to the director, based on fact. Russians were smuggling coke in the fabric of children's clothing.
"a malcontent who knows how to spell"
Im betting he meant that they sewed bags of coke in the lining....nay, Im positive
shareNo, the fabric was impregnated with the coke.
"a malcontent who knows how to spell"
I also remember hearing about that, it was done, and nothing in this film was improbable, in fact, much of it was based on things that actually happened as in this case.
If you don't know what you're talking about don't make posts like this.
"Why would a banana grab another banana? Those are the kinds of questions I don't want to answer."
You gotta be kidding. The cost of pressing coke into the fur/whatever of coats would be exorbitant. There is absolutely no sense in this procedure. Then you have the ridiculous process of removing the stuff by soaking the coats in water (probably thousands of coats by the way) then boiling the water, etc etc.
You guys are full of gullable sh- it. The director heard a "story"....period.
You do realize the character is a furrier and the coats are synthetic? If he owned the mills the coke could be applied during the manufacturing process.
It would not be neccessary to boil the water. It could be spread thin enough to evaporate. The heating of the spoon was just so the customer could check the product at that time.
If this was on a very large scale, it is quite plausible.
I've lived long enough to know that if you can think it, someone else is probably doing it.
"a malcontent who knows how to spell"
You obviously know a lot about cocaine, too
shareNever used it. Chemicals are applied to fabrics most of the time. Usually sizers, finshes or color fixatives. Cocaine would be easy to add to a sizer or finisher if it remained stable. Who's to say it would work on synthetic fur? It's just an idea that Gray came up with. The real case was regular children's clothing, which means cotton, wool, or polyester. My guess would be cotton since it would'nt be as likely to have a chemical reaction.
"a malcontent who knows how to spell"
I was being sarcastic
shareI was being serious.
"a malcontent who knows how to spell"
The OP: "WTF, this plot point was totally unbelievable! It's impossible!"
People replying in thread: "Actually, it's based on a real event. You see..."
The OP: "Nuh uh! I don't find that to be logical! There is no way that there could possibly be facts that I am simply unaware of! I know everything and am infallible!"
People replying in thread: "Here's exactly how the procedure works..."
The OP: "You're a poopyhead!"
/thread
The OP: "WTF, this plot point was totally unbelievable! It's impossible!"
People replying in thread: "Actually, it's based on a real event. You see..."
The OP: "Nuh uh! I don't find that to be logical! There is no way that there could possibly be facts that I am simply unaware of! I know everything and am infallible!"
People replying in thread: "Here's exactly how the procedure works..."
The OP: "You're a poopyhead!"
/thread
Exactly right. share
How about you suspend logic when you watch a damn fictional movie. I liked the movie and i didn't give a damn about how that got the drugs in the country. If you wanna watch a movie about that watch Maria full of grace!
sharesensored
ur stupid