While this is a very interesting take and the scar definitely suggests this, I have a few problems with this interpretation. In the first place, I don't think that the idea of the muffin's being drugged was very well established, other than the fact that they are deliberately featured in two scenes, suggesting some sort of importance; other than that, its not clear and up to conjecture. However, that I can live with - I don't need to have everything in a movie spelled out for me, in fact I'd rather have to think for myself. But, if the beginning, where Karen emerges from the shower, is really supposed to be the beginning chronologically, it doesn't really make sense why the radio is reporting on seemingly-typical violence in the Middle-East. Upon reading this theory, I rewatched the beginning and focused on this radio broadcast, which mentions bombings in the region of Karbala, Iraq. It seems odd that the broadcast would not feature the mass chaos that supposedly occurred in the region in which the film takes place. Unless, of course, this scene is meant to draw the comparison between the religiously motivated violence in the Middle-East with the events of the film; a view which I can understand. Lastly, however, there is a scene in which the cult lieutenant, the one who mentions the 'addictiveness' of the muffins, laments his inability to see signs of God. I suppose the muffins could have just failed to work on him or something, but it doesn't quite line up. Either way, it's an interesting interpretation that adds to my understanding of the film, which I greatly enjoyed.
reply
share