On set pictures !

Hi Vlad,

On Seagal's sets you weren't allowed to smoke within 50 meters of him. I guess you didn't have a problem lighting a cigarrette on Van Damme's sets?

Good luck with your' acting!

Thanks Young_Film_Maker102 for posting this on the Seagal board.

You were born a pig farmer.
You'll always BE a pig farmer.
And now, you will DIE a pig farmer.

First of all, I would like to tell you how sorry I am for getting back at you after such a long time. I completely forgot to check for new posts here on this site.
Then I want to wish you a Happy New Year and hope your hollidays rocked.

Now, let's get back to business, to say so ...


As for your first question, I really had no idea how the director (which is a really nice guy, by the way) got along with Seagal. I mean, I have witnessed no fightings between them and no dirty words were addressed from either one of them.

Now your second question ...
"Attack Force" is definitely one of the worst movies I have ever seen in my entire life: awful story, awful acting for a number of actors here and there and what makes this movie a real piece of garbage, is continuity: if you could just pay close attention to the make-up all along the movie, then you would definitely say: "Is there at least one tiny little bit of continuity in this whole mess?". The perfect example: the final fight of the movie (Seagal vs. Ileana Lazariuc). At some time a big scar (caused by Seagal) appears somehow between her boobs. Just look at that finale fight in the movie and it's impossible not to see that scar which is huge and bloody. And from that moment on take a very close look at that scar to see how it changes (in different shots): one time it start from the left shoulder, another time is starts from the right shoulder and it goes on like this the whole fight. And I am not talking here about a tiny little bit of blood drop, it's a huuuge scar, man. Maybe it sounds like a comedy movie what I am talking about here, but just look very careful at least at this final fight.
As for "Shadow Man", it looks better than this "Attack Force" piece of junk. I mean, the story is more realistic and the actio is watchable. From a scale from 1 to 10, I will rate this one somewhere between 4 and 5. You can clearly see in both movies Seagal's stuntdouble face in a numerous scenes. Which sucks big time.

For someone who doesn't know how I look like, I guess it's pretty difficult to spot my face in either one of these two movies. I am one hell of an actor, right?
This is why I am gonna tell you a few times when you could spot me in both of these movies...
-> "Attack Force": my most clear appearance in this one is when a guy in kind
of a woodland camouflage steps down a big stairs and I appear from his right
hand side and fire a few rounds at him; then you can see me standing at a
table with this guy (we were both wearing suits), we get up (I put my jacket
on a stand against a wall) and go to the the weaponry to pick up our battle
uniforms and guns; after these particular moments, you can see me here and
there as the movie goes on;
-> "Shadow Man": exactly at the beginning of the movie, there is a guy wearing
a white surgical coat who climbs down some stairs and keeps a cage with a
few white mice in his right hand. Guess who that a**hole is? And
then there are a few moments when you can see me inside that strange
laboratory: one time I am typing at a computer and then you can clearly see
me when the laboratory's doors shut and the room gets filled with smoke and
we all struggle to escape.


I hope I was precise enough in my answers. Once again, I am so sorry for replying so late.
If you still have questions to ask or need additional information, please feel free to get back at me at anytime. You can also write on my personal e-mail address, which is the same as my username here at yahoo dot com.

Have a nice day, man !

Vlad .