I already posted this in another thread, but it's worth repeating here because it's so in line with your post: BIO2 was garbage. For crying out loud there weren't even any hot girls in it! The casting director needs to be tarred and feathered, how can you make a cheerleader movie with no hot girls????
If just about anyone other than Hayden were the lead in BIO3 I probably wouldn't have wasted my time, and I was pleasantly surprised - MUCH better movie than BIO2 - I actually really liked it.
And thanks to how much I liked BIO3 I was motivated to watch BIO4 which I like 99% as much as BIO3.
Perhaps I'm just thinking too much, but I just can't compare BIO3 and 4 to 1. To me, 1 kind of stands on its own, it's like comparing apples to oranges. 1 was obviously designed to be a star-studded high-budget blockbuster, and to me BIO3 intentionally avoided famous actors/actresses (with the obvious exception of Hayden) and just tried to be silly low-key medium-budget straight-to-video B-movies (B-movie is NOT an insult).
reply
share