GREAT GREAT MOVIE


I really loved the movie because it has brought back the enthusiasm of the audience after the disgusting Bring It On Again... It is in this movie that I had started to be a fan of Hayden Panettiere... I used to watch Heroes but I liked her better in this film...

reply

Yep! Just what I thought! In some ways, it's better than the original! Panettiere really does a fine job carrying it. I like the way her character doesn't back down from ANYBODY!

reply

Yes, this movie is carried by Hayden's charm. Without her and her body, it would be hard to get viewers. But the story is OK. The DVD outtake collection is great. There was a lot of good cheering too. A must for high school cheerleaders.

reply

Oh, great might be a bit strong of a word but the Bring it On sequels are enjoyable not because they are smart writing or enthralling cinema but because they are honest to what they are: purposely cheesy, light-hearted fun.

{{quiet brain or I'll stab you with a q-tip}}

reply

[deleted]

Great...the five year old fans of this film have made an appearance.

This movie SUCKED!

reply

Yes! This is my favorite Bring It On movie for some reason, lol. I like the others, too. This one is my favorite though and my least favorite is In It To Win It. (:

reply

I like this movie better than the others!!!

reply

I already posted this in another thread, but it's worth repeating here because it's so in line with your post: BIO2 was garbage. For crying out loud there weren't even any hot girls in it! The casting director needs to be tarred and feathered, how can you make a cheerleader movie with no hot girls????

If just about anyone other than Hayden were the lead in BIO3 I probably wouldn't have wasted my time, and I was pleasantly surprised - MUCH better movie than BIO2 - I actually really liked it.

And thanks to how much I liked BIO3 I was motivated to watch BIO4 which I like 99% as much as BIO3.

Perhaps I'm just thinking too much, but I just can't compare BIO3 and 4 to 1. To me, 1 kind of stands on its own, it's like comparing apples to oranges. 1 was obviously designed to be a star-studded high-budget blockbuster, and to me BIO3 intentionally avoided famous actors/actresses (with the obvious exception of Hayden) and just tried to be silly low-key medium-budget straight-to-video B-movies (B-movie is NOT an insult).

reply

[deleted]