MovieChat Forums > Silence (2017) Discussion > Is this really a religious movie?

Is this really a religious movie?


What's the ratio of wonderfully shot piece of art that I bet this should be and religious *beep* thrust in your throat?

What kinds of ideas does this movie convey?

Can a closed minded antitheistic, faith-hating *beep* that loves good cinema appreciate it as a beautiful work of art, or is it one of those preachy movies that present belief as the highest virtue, and rely on the supernatural to make sense?

This is the way the world begins. Not with a bang but a cry.

reply

Yeah. It's very well done. Scorsese actually remains agnostic for like 95% of the movie. It's never overly preachy but the characters are very rooted in their faith. If that makes you cringe, then *beep* it. Don't go see it. But it really is a beautiful work that needs some meditating over.

reply

Yes, cdleorivera...I agree!

reply

It's very religious but also an incredible piece of art. If you can't appreciate a compelling story just because it centers on a belief system that isn't yours you might need to learn how to get over yourself.

reply

I don't have a belief system

This is the way the world begins. Not with a bang but a cry.

reply

That, by very nature, is a belief system

reply

Cthulhu is miffed at you right now.

Unlike the Bye Bye Man, our Glorious Tentacled One doesn't need you to say or think his name to grab you up through the toilet... or to crush Justin Bieber's head! (I never get tired of watching that.)

reply

"I don't have a belief system "

lmao. Yes, yes you do. It may have been derived by yourself from you experiences and not a book, but you definitely have a belief system.

reply

Well depends of what you call a belief system. Of course, everybody does the way you put it. But his words "it centers on a belief system that isn't yours" imply that kind of a belief system that doesn't belong on the same league. Being an atheist instead of a theist is a difference much greater than being a muslim instead of a catholic, and the way its put in his sentence does not clarify that difference. So, yeah, I obviously do have a belief system but it's too dissimilar to his to be called the same thing.

This is the way the world begins. Not with a bang but a cry.

reply

So, yeah, I obviously do have a belief system but it's too dissimilar to his to be called the same thing.


Exactly.

Its always very annoying when people dont define their terms and say stupid nonsense like "Rejecting all religions is also a religion." or "Everything is a religion."

Usually the conversation ends when I ask them to define "religion". ;)

reply

You believe in the religion of pseudo-celebrity science. I bet you "know" that the universe in 13 billion years old, but I guarantee you can't do the math.

You pray to the God of unfalsifiable theoretical physics. Your post-modernist drivel doesn't impress anybody nearly as much as you think it does.

reply

I bet you "know" that the universe in 13 billion years old, but I guarantee you can't do the math.


Your or my stupidity doesn't challenge science in any way. Science and religion are not particularly contradictory, except in the heads of hopelessly deluded fundamentalists. You do realise that it was a priest and a physicist who came up with the idea of the Big Bang in the first place?

reply

Hi there. I am concerned you type too much, so the next time you want to use "God of unfalsifiable theoretical physics" you may replace it with "Logic" or "Reason"

Also I almost never aim to impress, and when I do, It's probably headed to another postmodernist

Subnote: I usually find "Bill Nye the Science Guy" a bit cringeworthy, but in your case he is an absolute must.
Now if you wouldn't mind, let me go open up a dog. Those lying scums who wrote my zoology textbook were never to be trusted.

This is the way the world begins. Not with a bang but a cry.

reply

Being an atheist instead of a theist is a difference much greater than being a muslim instead of a catholic, and the way its put in his sentence does not clarify that difference.

LOL! Please stop, you're killing me!

reply

Happily so

This is the way the world begins. Not with a bang but a cry.

reply

I don't have a belief system

😂 Thanks, you made my day.

reply

I idolize the Japanese and their culture which is why I don't think I can watch this movie. I do not believe in missionaries and what they do, who has the right to tell anyone what they should believe? And this movie seems to glorify the missionaries when to me they were in the wrong.

reply

Well, the film's religious consultant calls it "a Jesuit meditation" and "like living inside a prayer".

https://cruxnow.com/interviews/2016/12/07/father-james-martin-on-movie-silence/

So, I guess it is indisputably religious, but unlike most others of the genre these days, actually well made.

reply

Why not wait for the DVD release and then watch it with the sound turned off?

Warlock: What, like you're a big fan of the Fett?
McLane: No, I was always more of a Star Wars guy.

reply

You should read the book of job

reply

You don't have to be religious to appreciate this piece of art or the ideas it conveys. There are no particular supernatural elements to the film, and it doesn't treat the supposed existence of God as matter-of-fact. But I think you'd struggle with it if you despise and disrespect the religious, because it would then be hard to empathise or even sympathise with and understand the protagonists' circumstances.

I myself am an agnostic bordering towards atheism, but I have a great deal of respect for the genuinely faithful, as long as they do not seek to relentlessly impose their ideas on others (and the question is whether the priests in the film are misguidedly inflicting their faith on 17th century Japan, or reasonably spreading the word of God and the 'truth' as they see it, to other parts of the world). I see no wrong myself in those that proselytise as long as they respect the right of others to respectfully reject their message.

reply

I have a great deal of respect for the genuinely faithful, as long as they do not seek to relentlessly impose their ideas on others"

why?

do you apply that logic to people who believe the earth is flat or that pigs fly when you arent watching? maybe you wouldnt publicly chastise them, but respect them? That seems foolish, its like the modern movement to ignore experts by the less educated masses

reply

"its like the modern movement to ignore experts by the less educated masses"
You reply basically saying religious preaching/.indoctrination okay and harmless and sugesting they should treat harmless conspiracy theories and the fantasy of pigs flying... on the same level .. And you go around calling the masses uneducated? Haha
I mean you asked 'why?' To someone saying they dont tolerate indoctrination and religious conversion tactics. So you obviously think those things are not despicable like they are.., and that people questioning others who try to convert everyone they meet should be out finding the tiny minority of harmless flat earners, next to the 100's of millions of delusional christians. And treating them on the same level...

¿¿¿¿¿¿¿¿¿¿¿¿¿¿¿¿¿¿¿
Perception Is Reality
???????????????????

reply

not sure how you deduced a few of those things, im not saying much of what you say I said :) I dont think preaching religion is harmless no, I think its just as foolish as those flying pigs was my point and both should be ridiculed for similar reasons. Language barrier perhaps bit Im presuming we are actually both coming from the same side

reply

Well put.

reply

It's less about religion and more about the tests of faith. Would you let others suffer for you? Would you symbolically reject your faith to prevent that suffering?

I'm not religious and I loved every minute of it.

reply

Spiritascent...exactly!

reply

I wondered the same thing. I think one of the most evil things humans can do is go into someone else's culture an attempt to "convert" them to yours.

reply

It's an interesting debate question. FORCING people of another culture to convert to yours is one thing, but these Japanese WANTED to be Catholics once they were told about Jesus. What's wrong with that? I think its just as evil to think that a culture should just keep to their own. That's a little too similar to segregation. Although, who the hell wants globalization? Who wants every country to look the same? Who wants McDonalds to be the international cuisine? Uniqueness in culture is essential to intelligence, I think.... It's a tough call.

reply

Yes, TheMichael. Its is a tough call. Same thing is happening with Muslims in Japan today. Japan wants to protect its culture, just as depicted in this film.

reply

I don't think you understood the film.

The priests genuinely believed they were doing good by spreading what they perceived to be the truth. One can argue about the wisdom or misguidedness of such a pursuit, but I don't see how anyone can describe it as 'evil' or simply part of a consciously imperialist desire to make Japan exactly like Europe.

I suppose by your rationale, no one should be allowed to bring their own cultures to other countries and discuss them with the indigenous population.

I for instance have had Muslim friends who've peacefully attempted to convert me do you speak by spreading their own reasons for being part of the religion. Of course, I respectfully declined to convert, but I don't resent them for attempting to pass on to others a belief system they consider to have had a beneficial impact on their lives. Now, if they tried to force their beliefs on me, that would be a whole different discussion, but they didn't. The simply tried to spread what they believe to be the truth, and I don't begrudge them for that. Do you?

reply

When the movie began, it looked as if Spiderman and Kylo Ren were going to try to save the world. They were Jesuits missionaries going to Japan to find their compatriot and check out the apparent campaign against foreigners going on in feudal Japan. There was a great deal of commercial interest at work as well, as the Dutch traders were there, looking to establish trade, and also, there was a lot of pending trouble with Protestant missionaries on the horizon. Having foreigners show up, and try to establish business interests is one thing, but trying to supplant the home-grown religion is something the ruling class really didn't like. They didn't necessarily mind the trade attempts, but messing with their religion was a different matter. It's similar to things going on today; but at the time of the movie, Christianity meant Roman Catholicism. The Jesuits also weren't completely accepted by the Catholics, either. (Rome - v- Paris, etc.) Similar to having Muslims floating around in the West, but having no real central authority as Catholics do, there are many flavors of Islam flying around. Not all of them are palatable to elements of the West. To be honest, I saw the Jesuits as the "bad guys" in this case, causing more problems than they had to. The mainline Buddhists at the time didn't want people living/dying for Jesus. They wanted people living/dying for the ruling class.

smipypr

reply