MovieChat Forums > Waterloo Road (2006) Discussion > Imogen's 'damaged' face...

Imogen's 'damaged' face...

posted 12 years ago by mjn-seifer
2 replies | jump to latest

I hope people don't take this the wrong way, but am I the only one who thinks that it's not as noticable as everyone is making it out to be? I'm not denying that her injuries show, but I only notice them if I actually try to look for them. However, they are acting like you can spot that she is "disfigured" from a distance, and she doesn't even look that disfigured when up close. Like I say, I'm not saying you can't see anything different if you look for it, but I don't think that it's the first thing you notice about her...

My favorite Final Destination is the 4th – DEAL with it!

[–] Moss-37 12 years ago

Yer,but it is more the case of how she feels about it in herself.She come to terms with it in the last episode and told that loser conner to sod off!

[–] mjn-seifer 12 years ago

That's the thing, I'd buy it more if it was just how she felt about herself - that would make sense, and I'd probably be exactly the same, but everyone seems to be acting like they can't help but notice it themselves. When Dynasty first met Imogen it was pretty much the first thing she talked about, and she'd barely even looked at her (although it was kind of hard to understand a word Dynasty was saying in that episode).

My favorite Final Destination is the 4th – DEAL with it!