Goldblum underused?


He was a much better villian in the film. I couldn't understand why he wasn't in it more. They should have had him instead of the actual head of the corporation guy.

Would rather see Jeff being nasty than saving the world from aliens with an Apple Mac.

---------------------------
http://www.thewrongtree.com

reply

Yeah I totally agree. I wanted him to totally eclipse the nothing CEO role and be the main bad guy. It was good to see him dark and not typecast.

reply

Yup, more jeff was needed.

"I'm gonna get you a gift"
-A chainsaw?
"..........or a book"

reply

YES!! I So agree with you on that one! He was such a good villain!

Jeff Goldblum Online
http://jeffgoldblumonline.net/

reply

I agree that he could have had more of Goldblum in the movie.

But to be fair, he already eclipsed the CEO guy in the story. It was clear that Jeff's character was the hatchet man who did the dirty work for the company. It made sense that they would insulate the boss to some degree from the shaddy methods.

I really liked the scene where Goldblum goes off on poor Linney when she tries to tell them about the glitch. He was very sinister.

reply