Is it any good?

When all else fails it appears to be your policy to argue on the basis of typo's.

My posting in other boards has no relevance here, and if you actually did read anything I wrote on there, you'd see that I've had more than one "discussion" with several users.

As for the usage of the word 'suck', well I'd use the word SHI_T as that's more indicative of this series but that as you may have noticed gets censored.

What really pissed me off about this series was how good it looked in the trailer, it looked truly disturbing and mildly scary, which is good. What I ended up getting after seeing the first episode was a lot of disappointment, however I thought the first episode was the best of all of them so far as it was the most entertaining especially considering that there isn't any dialogue in the whole thing, and that's saying something about the entire series.

When you name something "Nightmares and Dreamscapes" then you shouldn't be delivering something so hackneyed, melodramatic and the complete opposite of scary especially when you attach Stephen Kings name on it. I mean this is the same guy who wrote "The Shining" a story that DID give me nightmares.

I'm not bashing made for TV productions, I am a big fan of shows like "The Outer Limits", which is actually somewhat similar but always leaves an ominous feeling on the viewer, something totally lacking when viewing this.

If you'd like to argue about American foreign policy (which is mostly what I have argued on the Hotel Rwanda boards) then do so, if not don't bring up other postings since they bear no relevance here. It's quite obvious I'm not a troll, you wanted a full explanation on my viewpoints and I have obliged you, I'd appreciate it if you didn't make a follow up post consisting only of my typo's, thank you.