End of the Whole Mess - Rip Off or Ripped Off? (SPOILERS)
Okay, so I'm currently working my way through the DVD boxset of Nightmares and Dreamscapes, and enjoying it immensely. However, something struck me as very familiar about "The End of the Whole Mess". I remembered reading a short story back in the late 90s about two guys who develop a serum that'll change the world (I couldn't remember what it did) but which brought about the end of the world instead. Digging through an old bookcase, I found the story - "Hell Hath Enlarged Herself", in a collection titled "What You Make It" by Michael Marshall Smith.
After re-reading the story the similarities are very clear. Here's a quick comparison:
End of the Whole Mess - two brothers produce a serum to eradicate agression, distribute it worldwide, but fail to foresee the serious negative consequences that bring about the end of the world. (Thalidomide is referenced as a cautionary tale before they go through with their plan.) The story is narrated by the less culpable brother as he contemplates his death.
Hell Hath Enlarged Herself - two friends (who "grew up as close as brothers") produce a serum containing nanabots that can heal any ailment in the body, and even alter the brain to develop a "sixth sense". It accidentally gets distributed worldwide, and causes serious negative consequences that bring about the end of the world. (Thalmidomide is referenced as a cautionary tale after the two realise what they have done.) The story is narrated by the less culpable friend as he contemplates his death.
So, pretty similar I reckon!
My question is, has anyone else noticed this, and does anyone have any idea who wrote their story first? If so, could there be elements of heavy influence, or is it all merely a coincidence!?
(btw, I'm not trying to knock either King or Smith - I'm a huge fan of both.)