MovieChat Forums > Seraphim Falls (2007) Discussion > Angelica Houstons part??????????

Angelica Houstons part??????????


The movie was good. The movie would have been fine without Angelica Houstons part. That was weird and useless. Anybody else agree?

reply

you obviously did'nt get that part at the end

reply

Could you explain that part to me?

reply

Rent the DVD. They explain her part in the special features. She essentially was the devil, here are your options guys. The symbolism at towards the end got a bit heavy but imo it pulled it all together without being to absurd.

reply

You guys did see her name on the back of the wagon didn't you? There was a little sign that said:
Louise
C
Fair
prop.

Louise C Fair = Lucifer.

I actually caught that during the movie, it is not onscreen long though.


David.

reply

wow, cool, I didnt catch that during the first watch - but I was under the impression that she was the devil or a metaphor at least.

very cool ;-)

reply

****SPOILERS****








So, what? They both died in the desert? And when they split paths, one went to heaven and one to hell?












Thank you for voting Democratic.

reply

^^That's a cool theory, but not really what's implied.

-------
Neon Genesis Evangelion is the worst anime show ever created.

reply

What was implied?

*SPOILERS***





How else would they have met the Devil? They got woozy and disoriented, and at that moment the Devil appeared to each of them. Then are we expected to believe a gut-shot Neeson could walk out of the desert?










Thank you for voting Democratic.

reply

They both made a deal with the Indian and Louise so it would be absurd to think one went to hell and the other to heaven. And yeah, it could be possible for them to survive. But as for their fate after walking away we have no idea.

I like going into depth on movies too, but I think people are just going to wind up confusing themselves with this one. It's a great and simple Western that didn't get the wide release it deserved, and for me that's basically all it is.

-------
Neon Genesis Evangelion is the worst anime show ever created.

reply

I had some mixed feelings...

There's always dabs of symbolism, but more subtle, especially for a western depicting a bit of realism.

****SPOILERS BELOW***:

...so when she came as the devil (I didn't catch the name, but with the temptation of revenge over life--pretty obvious symbolism there alone), I thought it got a bit too much...what was she doing out there anyways and having one bullet?

Overall, enjoyable...I love westerns--all kinds!

But, lol, my favorite part was the jumping out of the horse part, LOL, I was laughing minutes on end with my brother, we even rewinded it and did it in slow motion...LOL I'm thinkin' about it now...LMAO...CLASSIC!

reply

I had some definite mixed feelings too. I thought it was completely odd that the makers of this film (which I mostly enjoyed) just jumped into this super-surreal mode with both the old man at the pool and Mrs. Addams as the devil (which I, like you, thought was pretty obvious). It just didn't fit, IMO. You can have a movie full of symbolism but I thought it was weird that they went to the extent that they did with it after almost an entire movie with no surreality/obvious plot-bending symbolism. The ending was good though.

I'm Bill Pardy.
http://www.editred.com/bionicRod

reply

I thought it made sense. By the time the two reach the desert, they are both delirious with rage, hunger, thirst, exhaustion and guilt. A torrent of emotions and physical need. So it isn't strange that they would start to see hallucinations and feel a bit insane. I think that part of the money made perfect sense and truly expressed the desperation that both characters would feel at a time like that.

As for them dissappearing into thin air, I think it is a way of expressing that it doesn't matter what happened to them next. What is important in the context of the film is that they made their peace with themselves and with each other after long last. That is the crux of the film. Not whether or not they survived.

I thought this was a very well done film.

reply

So it isn't strange that they would start to see hallucinations and feel a bit insane.


I guess, but the fact that they both saw the same woman, "the Devil", means that they were neither experiencing insanity or hallucinations, doesn't it? Anyway you're right, it's a good movie, but the ending just doesn't make a lot of sense to some people. Me included.

I'm Bill Pardy.
http://www.editred.com/bionicRod

reply

Wow, and I was wondering were Angelica Huston was. I just watched a cut version of the film, (at a theatre, no less) and there was no Angelica Huston at all. And I was very confused about what happened. Anyway, I need to see the whole movie on DVD I guess.

And yes, Neon Genesis Evangelion sucks.

reply

Where did you see this cut version? How many minutes did it run? The U.S. version was 111 or 112 min. (though some places state 115 min)

reply

When you introduce the 'devil' in a western (in the last 5 minutes) selling a 'cure all' under the name of Louise C Fair, being played by Angelica Houston, the last description it could be given is great and 'simple'.

It actually begs for 'confusion' and 'depth'.

I really, really liked it, but I think it could have quite easily done without the existentialism at the end.

reply

Carver isn't gut shot. If you look carefully, it looks as though Gideon's shot mostly wings Carver in his right side. You can see where the blood is on the edge of the shirt. Also it isn't until after Gideon lifts Carver's shirt to have a look that he offers him water and then helps him up.

It might also help to remember that at the beginning, Carver's men assume Gideon is "gut shot" too, when in reality it's just his shoulder.

reply

The top-hatted Indian and the diabolic snake oil saleswoman came out of left field to put an unwelcome sophomoric finish to a really well made movie up to that point.

The screenplay writer could surely have devised a plausible denouement more in keeping with the style of the movie. This looked like they had found a couple of pieces from Alice in Wonderland and glommed them on to get the thing finished rather than take a couple of days to write something better. A quick phone call to Clint Eastwoo0d would have been a good plan if he was really stuck.

Photography was terrific and excellent performances from the two Irishmen (not Scots!), Brosnan and Neeson, as well as a good cameo from Angie Harmon.

reply

"A quick phone call to Clint Eastwoo0d would have been a good plan if he was really stuck."


It differs depending on eveyrone's interpretation but HIgh plains drifter is basically about an avenging angel punishing people for their sins. He pushed to make it more ambivalent too which shows that Eastwood clearly isn't again some fantasy elements in his westerns either. Speaking of Eastwood films, the part where the soldiers "raid" Carver's farm reminded me a lot of the beginning of The outlaw josey wales.



I hadnt caught the name on the wagon but i found the devil symbolism to be evident.

reply

Not implied???

**SPOILER***






Well, lessee...

- She's wearing black
- She appears out of nowhere and vanishes just as quickly
- The place she appears in is hot... dare I say hotter than hell (in fact the whole movie is a descent into hell: they start in the snow, remember)
- She trades them their life (or the one thing that can give them life: water and a ride out) for death (guns and bullets).
- Oh yeah, and her wagon has a phonetic "Lucifer" painted on the back.

I don't see how it could be anymore obvious short of having "SATAN" tattooed on her forehead.

reply

It's pretty easy to figure out what Angelica Huston is supposed to represent. It's not so easy to figure out exactly what happens to Gideon and Carver once the credits roll.

And it's freaking difficult to figure out exactly why the makers of a fantastic, down-to-earth, grim and gritty western thriller decided to wrap things up with ham-fisted metaphorical hoodoo.

reply

Guys, you get the part about the metaphorical figures and symbolism, but you still think Neeson got shot? Think. He had one bullet... he used it on Wincott when Brosnan was holding him. Then Brosnan got his pistol... no bullets left. Neeson never got shot, because a metaphorical devil cannot produce a real, physical, bullet. Neither of them had anything to shoot anybody with when they got out there.

reply

The sign on the back of her wagon (in addition to Louise C. Fair) was something like "cleanses the blood" and "absolution of the bowels". They both traded what would save their lives to her, for one bullet and the chance for revenge. In real life, it wouldn't make sense to a normal thinking person to give up a horse for a bullet when you are in the middle of a desert. But it was a beautiful metaphor for the single-minded madness that overtakes one, when revenge is sought.

I loved it, and I loved her part. If anyone saw High Plains Drifter, Eastwood's character was also the devil who appeared without warning, didn't seem to sweat in the hot sun, and always had something to trade to the townspeople (whom he made to choke on their own collective guilt), and they willingly agreed to the foolish decision. There were tons of Eastwood movie references (i.e. the duplicitous preacher from "Pale Rider", and dropping the knife on the bad guy from up high, like he knocked out the bad guy from up high in "Joe Kidd"), and this was a great one.

This movie really impressed me, but if I had not seen all the Eastwood movies and the many Clint points therein, then it might have been a little slow. I hope it does great on DVD.

reply

If Angelica Hueston is the devil I want to go to hell if only she could make herself twenty years younger.

reply

Neither character took the cure all potion.

They shared their water.

They were near the edge of the desert.

I see no reason why they did not survive and go their separate ways.

That's all.

reply

What was the cure all potion about? What did it symbolize? And what would have happened if they had drank it?

reply

Two devil characters in the movie:

The indian at the pond
and the Angelica Houstons.

The movie started out quite nice and going thru all the different part of western vistas then it crashes with the weird hallucination scenes.

And I did lose my attenion after 2/3 of movie and the ending was quite disappointing.

My life isn't any better than yours.

reply

Angelica Houston's part represents the Devil. She's savvy, seductive and while in the midst of the desert heat, she appears to both characters giving them what they want, instead of what they need. Very surrel, and it works.

reply

this idea of houston offering death instead of life doesnt hold up.


both thought they would be killing the other and taking his horse and water anyways.

reply

I know what you are trying to say, but the good movie went south. Intention behind the last act is clear, but the last act was the weakest part of this movie.

My life isn't any better than yours.

reply

I agree, in a film like this which up until that point hadn't been relying on symbolism and metaphors to tell the story, the appearance of a devil character just felt liked a lazy plot device to me, as if the writer was thinking: "Okay, I've got the two main characters into the desert for the final confrontation, but they've got no bullets. How do I set this up?"

Believe me, I really liked the film up until the final twenty minutes or so. But in a film like this, such a last second handbrake-turn just screwed everything up, and worse than that, the devil imagary wasn't necessary to hammer home how bent on revenge these men were. The film was doing a damn fine job of making that point up until then.

reply

Totally understood. Though I liked it the way it was, (more so, I accept it the way it is) I do wish there was something more real that happened that fit with the rest of the movie. It felt like it was building up to much more than it did.

reply

Naah, it wasn't lazy. I liked the ending. It was rather poetic. They both die, and it is their obsession with revenge and killing the other one that kills them. It drove them nuts, unable to think clearly, and led them to do the insane thing of trading their own lives in order to kill the other. However, when the time came for them to do each other in, the joke was on them and they were left completely powerless to. They finally see the futility of it, and repent, of sorts, but it is too late to save their own lives. They're both in the desert, no water, no way out, and they each set out on their own, which is symbolic for each man dies alone.

Great movie for a western.

reply

obvious half way through the movie that one or both will likely die in their quest.
It didn't need the ending it had, to drive that point home.
The ending was out of nowhere because the rest of the movie was a straight western (although I'm not sure I'd call it a western, really). However, there wasn't the strange allegorical symbolic stuff until the last twenty minutes. The title basically meaning "fallen angel" doesn't explain or excuse the fact that it ended the way it did. It would have been simpler and more poetic for them to each have the one bullet in their gun already, saving it for the other, until the end when they find they can't do it, and made their peace with each other, then leaving it up to the imagination of the viewer about whether they made it out alive or not.

reply

"their obsession with revenge and killing the other one" ? it seemed to me like liam neeson's character was the only one that wanted to do any killing.

---
What in heaven's name are you talking about?

reply

SPOILER BELOW INVOLVING THE MOVIE "I AM LEGEND". If you have not seen I AM LEGEND, then please do not read my post!!!!!




I agree with kirisute2001. I was really enjoying the film up until the last 20 minutes or so. Those last 20 minutes didn't fit at all with the rest of the movie in my opinion. The Devil just shows up with a bullet and some cure-all? What?!?! Its like I changed the channel and I was watching something completely different. It just didn't flow with the rest of the movie. Why couldn't they come to terms with each other without some silly ghost/spirit side story? I really hate it when movies throw in religion when it is not necessary. It happened here and it has happened in a bunch of other movies. One recent one that comes to mind is I AM LEGEND. That movie was sooooo good until that woman showed yapping about "God told me..." and that whole "look at the butterfly" thing and Big Willy dying for our sins just like Jesus (since when did searching for a cure for cancer become a sin?). Really, was all that necessary? Couldn't she have just been some regular chick? Ok sorry, I am rambling now, but you get my point.
When I go see a movie, I want to go see just that... a movie, not some sermon about how we have to believe in God and the Devil and angels.....

reply

[deleted]

dont go see those movies then bro,

and just cuz a movie has a message and metaphors doesnt make it a sermon, cuz trust me a lot of good movies have a message, u might not agree with it, but hey watever

in the end its not your movie its the directors etc, so if they wanna put that stuff in, i dont really think theyre like "oh no, sugarlullaby isnt gonna see this cause i mentioned GOD"

the world doesnt revolve around you, sorry

reply