Taurus Entertainment (QUESTIONS)

To be fair I will admit that I have yet to see neither "Day of the Dead 2: Contagnum" or "Creepshow III" (though something tells me that is a good thing).

That being said what the hell is wrong with these people? First I'll bitch about Day of the Dead 2. WHY would they feel the need to do a crappy sequel to a classic film that is ALREADY the third installment of a successful cult series? First time I saw it in a store I just stopped and staired thinking "WHY?!?!?". Plus I hear it had NOTHING to do with Day of the Dead so why not just call it "Contagnum" or "Sh!tty Low-Budget Zombie Flick", why tarnish the name of George Romero and Day of the Dead with an unofficial sequel?

Now onto Creepshow III. First of all, Creepshow III?!? Last I checked Creepshow 2 was Creepshow 2, not Creepshow II. If you going to make a crap film call it Creepshow 3. Now I just saw a fan trailer on youtube, OH MY GOD those effects look aweful from the crappy monster mounth and red-eyes on that one dude the the blood, which is like bright red and totally unrealistic looking. And those same douchebags Ana Clavelle and James Duddleson did it, PLUS Duddleson is working on the Creepshow and Day of the Dead remakes. WHY!?!?!?!?!?!?!? Creepshow and Creepshow 2 are classics because they capture the look and feel of on 50's horror comics and have a great 80's feel to them and even without the involvement of Romero and King this can be done if the makers actually care and know what to do. Creepshow III I already herd has CGI in it, which is a huge no no as everything in Creepshow 2 looked great (like the blob and woodin' chief) without CG and it added to the Creepshow feel.

So in conclusion, how the hell did these morons get the rights to make false entrys into George Romero's films? Please tell me! And I hear the crackheads are doing Creepshow 4....PLEASE TELL ME THESE FILMS ARE NOT OFFICIAL AND A REAL CREEPSHOW 3 WILL COME OUT EVENTUALLY!!!!!