So confused
SPOILERS
Generally I'm a proponent of suspending disbelief, and giving a movie some credit when it comes to logical omissions... but for the life of me, I couldn't believe that all that was needed to stop the train was to get someone on the front car. There were so many ways they could have done that, before resorting to trying to derail a speeding chemical bomb in a town!
- Try using a helicopter again -- it only failed because of bad luck in timing, that caused the previous person to get hurt
- Try using a speeding car alongside (just like they ultimately did in the end -- why in gods name would it have to be someone from the train that jumped on board?
- Or, as I think someone suggested elsewhere, jumping back from the train car they got out in front.
... It just seems like such a glaring omission. It's not as though I'm coming up with a creative solution to the problem, that they just chose to ignore -- sometimes that can be a cheap shot to criticize a movie -- it's the very solution they ended up using to stop the train, they just waited til the end for some reason to try the easiest plan.
Not a bad movie, but annoying.