The implication, based on Bingham's direct phone call to Collins ("finish what we started") and the fact that Collins gets arrested in the news account, is that Collins was lying and Bingham was NOT acting alone. If that's the case and he was acting under orders from Collins when he murdered Sonya, then Collins is guilty of murder. (Think about it: if he wasn't behind Sonya's murder, why would he have turned to Bingham, an Army-trained sniper, for the simple task of "observing" her and "reporting back"? I think the correct interpretation is that Collins, knowing Bingham's hatred of Pointcorp and Sonya's status as a mole, manipulated him into killing her, just as the whole film was basically about Collins manipulating an unwitting Cal into helping him cover it up by exploiting their friendship and Cal's guilt over his feelings for Collins' wife. Collins is a manipulator.)
If, however, you take the alternate view that Collins was telling Cal the truth and Bingham was simply unhinged, it gets more murky. A zealous prosecutor could try and make the case that Collins is still guilty of murder or manslaughter because it was reckless of him to unleash Bingham on Sonya (knowing Bingham was a nut and capable of killing her out of a perverse sense of loyalty). It would be a longshot but not impossible. Obstruction of justice would be a very strong possibility, depending on whether he made any affirmative misrepresentations to the police during the course of their investigation. Regardless, the taint of the whole affair would ruin his political career.
reply
share