Husband question
i missed this part. why did the husband leave her?
shareBecause his life and his career were going nowhere and he didn't like that SHE was out all day doing something fulfilling while he sat home feeling sorry for himself, he would rather SHE sit home while he's off doing something.
share
That guy was such a doucher. I was glad when he left because then we didn't have to deal with his precious ego anymore. She was working her ass of for these kids and trying to perform one of life's noblest profession while getting no support--in fact attacked from all sides-- and all that guy could do was cry because he didn't have a good job. F.U. Dude!
Because she was pushing him to be something he didn't want to be and demeaning him for what he had accomplished. Because she wasn't making time for him or for their relationship. Because she was making life decisions without even consulting him. Because she wasn't taking an active part in the relationship. Because he was tired of having a wife who took him for granted and treated him like crap.
shareBut it would be fine if he was out having his dream career and she was at home doing nothing being treated like crap. That's what he said, HE can't be the one staying home waiting on her, because he's not HER.
shareLet's put the shoe on the other foot, reverse the genders of the characters. Suddenly, the whole focus of the film would be about how the teacher is a heartless bastard who takes his wife for granted. The students wouldn't ever get into what would be a pretty standard "Lifetime" movie, which would first celebrate her stoicism in the nightly waiting for him to come home, and then celebrate her bravery in divorcing him.
Put aside your sexist double standards and stop being a hypocrite.
What the film depicts is a relationship that is failing because one party wants to change the rules without consulting the other party, and one party who feels left behind by that, and who finally decides that divorce is better than being a doormat.
While it is easy to see that the whole failing marriage subplot was placed in the film to simply add another obstacle for "savior teacher" to overcome, and make her a more sympathetic character, it fell flat - because, outside of a single comment (which can be interpreted in several different ways) - the husband was written as a real person who actually cared more about her than she cared about him, and more about the relationship than she did.
Well put, joedog. She had no time for marriage, basically.
shareI agree that she screwed up a lot in the relationship but so did he. She didn't give him HARDLY enough time and she went off half-cocked and made decisions without consulting him. However, he gave her zero support and was flat out rude to her about her career. When he finally did say something he was whiny and petulant. He didn't communicate. It has nothing to do with gender... They were a bad couple.
Also she never demeaned him about his job... She pushed him to go back to school because she thought he really wanted to. He could have told her at any time he'd had a change of heart without being a jerk about it.
I don't know where all of these super judgmental comments came from. He left because she was never around. She's was gone all of the time and working three different jobs, she was just and absentee spouse.
Actually I think that is a real problem, one many couples could have. If he had the expectation that they would have a lot of time together after work, that he'd see his wife on a regular basis and she, without any warning or discussion, just starts taking multiple jobs to where all she does is work around the clock and the marriage itself takes a backseat to the job it could seem like a "bait and switch" scenario.
Where I fault him is that according to the way the film portrayed it, he never sat her down and expressed this and told her, finish out the semester or school year under your commitments but going forward into the future I need your more, I need you to work your job and not take extra jobs, spending time is important. I'm sure they could have worked it out. She'd probably work herself ragged if she kept that up too long anyway.
His error was never expressing feelings of not having his need for quality time with her, making a final decision and ending the marriage without talking this out and working on it.
There are five "love languages" people communicate in and usually each person will have their one main love language they need to receive love in. His may have been quality time. They are (in no order): Quality Time (making time for each other, showing you are a priority by spending quality time together, Words of Encouragement (Verbally affirming your love and value you have in a person, building them up with your words why you value them, how important they are to you), Physical Touch (closeness, affection, cuddling, holding hands, showing how much you love someone by desiring to be close together and have physical contact...a "touchy, feely" person), Gift Giving (surprising someone with gifts, showing you were thinking about them and you value them by getting them things) and Acts of Service (doing things for each other, showing love by serving someone, doing things for them).
His my have been quality time and she may have been starving this need by never giving it.
For the movies sake I understand the audiences main focus was this class of students, that's what the movie was about. In real life marriages should always come before work and if there are problems and disagreements it's always best to openly and honestly, in a spirit of kindness and love, to express them and share them so they can be addressed. He should have expressed his concerns over where the marriage was heading instead of just storing it all up internally and then making a final, marriage altering decision before she ever knew there was a problem.
This men vs. women debate is petty and juvenile. ANY spouse has the right to expect to be put first, man or woman. The main thing is do you know what their career is going into the marriage. Are you upset after the fact, after you already knew how much time they were expected to be away and you are now having "buyer's remorse" or did you go into the marriage expecting more time together and one spouse pulls a switch. People should know these things before marriage.
I expect time with my spouse. I just would have never married someone who is gone all the time, someone who can be called away all the time unexpectedly and travel and be out of town a lot. Personally I don't know how women marry soldiers. People that can be told to move to another country at the drop of a hat, can be gone on deployments 6-9 months. I'd never even date a soldier. I don't know why all of these soldier have girlfriends and wives. I guess quality time isn't that important for many.
Anyway, his needs are real. He should have talked about them and discussed how things could improve for the future, stop with all of the extra jobs.
Was ist der Sinn des Lebens?