The REAL Albert Pierrepoint was an advisor in the film, 10 Rillington Place. Although he is uncredited in the cast, and worked under an assumed name, it was him!! Apparently the execution scene was the first shown in detail in British cinemas and as this was still 'Government Official Secrets', they wanted to replicate the scene as realistic as possible, so Albert was brought in. I didn't know any of this, John Hurt recalls it on his commentary on the DVD, although I DO believe it, I was sceptical about Alberts 'crude' hanging jokes. Its well known he never joked or wallowed in his past capacity as executioner, whether it was serving behind his bar or as a technical advisor on a film set
Why don't you submit your comment into the trivia section for the film? And with the jokes, although he himself denied it has been said by all locals at his pub that he was famed for his "no hanging around" sign outside of the bar.
i read the original post, just got confused-lol in any case my ass still hurts!! goddamned teeth marks I BLAME SOCIETY!!! oh...and my tendancy to skim read...thats to blame too
"To Find Your Daughter You Must Brave The Darkness Of Hell..."-Christabella, Silent Hill
10 Rillington Place was the address where John Christie carried out his gruesome murders during the latter years of the war and just after, including the wife and child of Timothy Evans, who was hanged for their murders in error. In fact, even the police officer who had arrested Evens didn't believe he had done it in the end, and Evans himself maintained up to the end that he hadn't done it. Such is the intractability of the law, however, that the authorities ended up hanging both men for the same crime. Talk about a twofer!!
so what is it up to now? 50% + of the comment sections for all movies on here have someone claiming to be the son/daughter/grandfather/grandmother/dad/mon/uncle/aunt/friend
or my favorite.. "I worked on the film"
please....who really cares if any of that is true.. (doubtful even 10% are true) how does that help the film commentary?
I liked this film, acting was very good, I liked the story (not being a brit probably helped) and best of all, I am not related to, nor do I know anyone involved with the film
That was very interesting I did not know that about 10 Rillington Place. I can remember seeing the film when I was quite young. It has been the main reason why I do not believe in capital punishment. I wonder if Albert Pierrepoint felt any remorse at hanging an innocent man (Evans) and wanted to make amends by helping on the film which must have had a similar affect on a lot of people I am guessing?
At the time of his execution, no-one other than Timothy Evans and John Christie, knew of Evan's innocence. It was only afterwards that it became obvious John Christie was the murderer, and eventually he too was hanged. If you watch "10 Rillington Place", there's a scene where John Hurt actually says "Christie done it", but despite this denial of his guilt, he is still found guilty and executed. Apparently Timothy Evans was mildly mentally handicapped, and this is probably something that worked against him, rather than for him, as not much was made of this issue in the film. There's another wonderful British film made in 1991 called "Let Him Have It" that also deals with the issue of capital punishment, and also the character of Albert Pierrepoint makes a very brief appearence. The story line in "Let Him Have It" also deals with the wrongful execution of a mentally handicapped man, Derek Bentley. The hangings of both Evans and Bentley turned the tide of public opinion against capital punishment in the UK.
Its a bit of a known fact that whilst Christie did kill Beryl, its accepted that he may not have killed baby Geraldine, which points the finger at Evans. Evans was pardoned for his sentence which was the murder of Beryl leading to his execution
Evans was charged with and found guity of the murder of baby Geraldine. He was never tried for the murder of Beryl, which doesn't mean he never killed her. The book and the film 10 Rillington Place has inaccuracies as Ludovic Kennedy was opposed to the death penalty and made the story fit his own beliefs. A lot of people think Christie did it because they saw it in the film, there was never any evidence of this. There was no evidence of Beryl being gassed as Kennedy portrayed. Evans' conviction was only quashed as Christies evidence was considered unsafe, but Christie was not the only one to give evidence.
The one thing that I hate about movies like this, even though I still plan to see it once I can get my hands on it, is that the title itself is very disceptive: "The Last Hangman". There are alot of people that believe that Albert Pierrepoint was the last executioner in the UK. He was not. You can find this out by paying attention to history or by reading his autobiography, "Executioner: Pierrepoint" which I have read, cover to cover, three times. Albert Pierrepoint was not the last hangman in Britain. He was the last Official Chief Executioner in Britain. When he resigned his position in 1956, capital punishment continued in Britain for another eight years until 8:00AM 13 August 1964 when Gwynne Owen Evans was hanged at Strangeways Prison in Manchester by Harry Allen and Peter Anthony Allen was hanged simultaneously at Walton Prison in Liverpool by Robert Leslie Stewart. These were the last two executions ever carried out in England and done so that no one man could claim that he was the last hangman. He is also referred to as the most prolific hangman in British history having been credited with the executions of some 433 men, 17 women, 6 U.S. Soldiers at Shepton Mallet and some 200 condemned Nazi's at the end of the Second World war (In Hamelin, Germany, on December Friday the 13th, 1945, before 13 official witnesses, he hanged 13 people (10 men, 3 women), at half hour intervals, for crimes committed at Bergen Belsen and Auschwitz. The women were hanged individually, the men in pairs.)
I can do all things through Christ who strengthens me. Philippians 4:13
I'm intrigued about the hanging of the US soldiers. What was all that about? I'm surprised the US didn't intervene and get them deported?
I am not certain on all the particulars about those six US Service men. My understanding (from reading his autobiography) is that all six were convicted of capital crimes by US Military Courts Martial and sentenced to death while stationed in Britain during World War II. Pierrepoint was simply the official executioner utilized by the US Military at Shepton Mallet. Whether this was a requirement by the British Government (since the executions were taking place on British soil) or not, I don't know. It is my understanding that these men were not tried or convicted by British Courts. In his autobiography, Pierrepoint complained that he was required to carry out the executions by American SOP (Standard Operating Procedures) which included using the sterotypical American style hangmans noose (including the coil knots typically thought of on a hangmans noose) instead of the British style (a rope with a metal eye loop at both ends where one end passed through the other to form the noose and had a leather covering over that end of the rope, and had a rubber washer to hold it in place). If I remember right, he stated that the nooses could not be loosened after the hangings and had to be cut off. He also is said to have complained about the time it took to carry out each hanging (much longer than those he normally conducted due to having to read the Death Warrant while the condemned stood on the gallows and allowing for last words and other protocols - his quickest execution on record was said to be seven seconds from the time the condemned was led from the condemned cell through a door onto the trap door, noose fixed in place, trap sprung - seven seconds).
I can do all things through Christ who strengthens me. Philippians 4:13
reply share
In this thread it's said he executed 6 American military under sentence of death by Courts Martial. In other readings the figure is 20. According to Syd Dernley's book, the figure is around 200. Whatever the number, they were all executed at Shepton Mallet military prison and were for American servicemen reputedly transfered there from all over Europe (whilst on active service) found guilty of rapes and murders (often both) and convicted by Courts Martial. Given the number of servicemen of all nationalities all over Europe at that time and the ease and motive for crime (linked to stress-trauma for young men in war situations), the figure of 200 is somewhat believable even though it sounds enormous at first thought. Dernley says the American authorities requested the British provide an executioner and the British suggested their Number 1 - AP, but however demanded he be paid the Home Office rate by the Americans for each and every prisoner. More likely is that the 2 authorities mutually agreed on the executioner, whilst AP himself might have pressed for full fees (and why not?). In any case the rate at that time was 10 guineas (ÂŁ1.05), so 200 'jobs' would have been ÂŁ210, an huge sum at that time. These are only words from Dernley though, who himself claims to be quoting AP, as there is no mention of a British assistant and certainly not Dernley himself.
It's said on these boards and elsewhere, that the figure of 200 relates to Nazi condemned, but in other writings his war crimes tally was 'only' 47 prisoners - the Belsen lot. The other main trials were dealt with by the American authorities, so this detail tends to seem true.
Drac65: These were the last two executions ever carried out in England and done so that no one man could claim that he was the last hangman.
When they carried out these hangings did they know they would be the last? Capital punsihment stopped because Labour won a narrow victory in the general election two months later, the incoming Home Sec. Frank Soskice said he would not be signing any death warrants. A year later it was officially suspended and abolished in 1969.
I thought Timothy Evans was pardoned? This means the Monarch 'forgives' him - thats sad as it is widely believed he didn't do it - if he didn't do it how could he be forgiven? When a conviction is quashed it is understood the person did not do it. So in giving Timothy Evans a 'pardon' not enough was done. It is true that Christie was not the only one to give evidence at Timothy Evans trial, but perhaps he was the only witness who had an interest in delivering the blame to Timothy Evans.
You've got that the wrong way round. Evans probably killed his wife but was tried and convicted for killing his child only. He killed his wife and then fled, leaving the child. Christie couldn't have the Police poking about (though they did anyway I know) so he killed the child to delay attention and then conveniently allowed Evans to take the rap. Remember Evans voluntarily walked into a Police Station and blurted out he had killed his wife, not just on the film but factually as well. Why do that?
LET HIM HAVE IT The chacters of Craig and Bently were so brilliantly cast (Paul Reynolds and Christopher Eccleston) and the Judge (Michael Gough) was so evil that it just goes to show what happens when the Government of the day wants blood. It portayed hanging (and so all capital punishment) as evil and thats what it is. A better film on such a serious subject it would be difficult to imagine.
I am a bit of a whizz on Albert Pierrepoint and read that he had no remorse in hanging Evans or for that matter Ruth Ellis despite the public baying for her reprieve. Albert was totally loyal to the Government he worked for and carried out the ultimate sentance they had decreed, his opinion never entered the equation when carrying out his duty.
Yeah, what a stupid and idiotic comment, like the poster above me said, he carried out legally sanctioned executions, and he did that in a far humane way than most modern methods, he 'provided' painless and instant death, compared to the electrical chairs and lethal injections that take a while, even minutes to completely kill a person in a 'successful' execution.
An aspect that the movie portrays faithfully is his professionalism and the respect he had for the persons and their corpses, during and after the execution.
--- X-Men 3 = The Worst Movie of 2006. Brett Ratner = The Kegger that ruined the X-Men Franchise.
and you know this how..... the proper way, where your neck breaks instantly, is painless. just watched the movie, and i'm about to look a bit up on albert. very good movie, too.
and you know this how..... the proper way, where your neck breaks instantly, is painless. just watched the movie, and i'm about to look a bit up on albert. very good movie, too.
I would like to know the answer to your question myself rowanrobinson. Since no one has ever survived a judicial hanging that was carried out properly in order to articulate what the experience was like (i.e. did they feel anything when the rope yanked their body to a screeching halt and snapped their neck at approximately the 3rd, 4th and or 5th cervical vertabrae - was it painful? Did you feel anything?). Judicial hanging has always been a gruesome and haphazard affair. It was both an art and a science, perhaps more of one than the other. If not done properly one of two things would happen: a) If the drop was not long enough or the noose was improperly positioned, then the poor wretch's neck would not be broken instantly and he or she would strangle to death at the end of the noose or, b) If the drop was too long, then you ran the risk of decapitating the condemned man or woman. This has happened on more than one occasion. Around 1903 when Blackjack Ketchum was hanged in Clayton, NM they calculated the drop for his weight at the time of conviction and did not account for the immense weight he put on while waiting for his execution. He was decapitated. The last woman hanged in Arizona was decapitated prompting the State to switch to the Gas Chamber. But if done properly as you said, it is thought to be painless or at least so quick that the condemned has little time to feel pain before they are said to be instantly unconscious. But since no one has survived a hanging or the Electric Chair or the Gas Chamber or Lethal Injection for that matter, all we have to base our assumption on is the opinions of the Medical Examiners who perform the autopsies and other medical professionals as to what they believe based on their knowledge of human anatomy and neurology as it currently stands. Since alot of what we once believed to be true medical fact in the past was eventually proven wrong as we learned more, who knows what we will learn in the future.
As to your wanting to lookup a bit on Albert Pierrepoint, my advice would be to read his autobiography, "Executioner: Pierrepoint". It is very good reading, in my opinion. It contains alot more historical fact about Pierrepoint, and capital punishment in Great Britain than the movie "The Last Hangman" will most likely ever contain (since I have not seen it yet - I plan to as soon as I can get my hands on a copy). Just look at the title. Pierrepoint was not the last executioner in England. He was the last Official Chief Executioner. Executions continued for another eight years after his resignation before abolition. Anybody with half a brain knows that all script writters and movie producers take loads of liberties with historical accuracy to produce a compelling and dramatical screenplay.
I can do all things through Christ who strengthens me. Philippians 4:13
reply share
I'm not certain where you get your info re: where the neck fractures occur in a proper hanging, but a fracture of the dens of the 2nd cervical vertebra is known as a "hangman's fracture"...coincidence or creative licence I don't know, but there you go. A fracture at this point would cause almost instant total paralysis, but that doens't mean that the brain cannot continue to function for a few seconds. Just my 2 cents.
Condoning state sanctioned execution is unforgivable. Just because the US carries out these barbaric acts does not make them ethically or morally acceptable. In terms of preventing crime all the evidence points to the fact that in states where execution is santioned murder is more likely to occur. It is no deterrent to murder and is more likely to encourage criminals to murder their victims in order to dispose of any evidence that may link them to a crime.
Then there is the moral issue of unsafe convictions. State sanctioned execution has been used for political and racist ends. There is no guarentee in the fairness of some of these convictions and if one innocent person's life is taken away by the state then that is one too many. It often surprises me that advocates of state execution who base their belief on the sanctity of a victims life have no regard for the lives of innocent people sent to the gallows.
Executions should be brought back for Drug Dealers..not the pushers on the street or the couriers but the guys at the very top. Drugs cause 90% of all crime from petty theft, muggings, shoplifting and burglary to gand related shootings were innocent people get shot... They deserve a slow and painful death so hanging would be too good for em
This might prove counter-productive. The top drug barons are the most evil people you can imagine. They won't intimidate witnesses, they will have them killed. They won't bribe policemen, they will have them killed. And they won't try to interfere with Lawyers or the Judiciary - they will have them killed. Or have I just got a bit of an attitude problem to drug barons?
You probably know more about films than crims, so stick to the films.
I'm anti-death penalty and I think that the bankers and money launderers who are the real movers and shakers should be put away for life with no possibility of parole, Unfortunately the death penalty was reinstated in my state (New York). It's some small comfort that there is a court-ordered moratorium on executions and they haven't taken place since 1976. The highest execution rate is in the state of Texas.
-------------------- Call me Bubbles, everybody does.
Going back to the original post in 10 Rillington Place the hangman who hangs Timothy Evens is listed in the cast as "Hangman", although it was Albert Pierrepoint who carried out the execution. But in Let Him Have It, which was made after Albert Pierrepoint died, the hangman is listed as Pierrepoint.
Thank you - I was wondering when someone would mention this...I suppose they had to change the title for the US to make it sound gruesome and interesting... bloody good film and bloody fantastic acting - I have just watched it and came to IMDB to see if anyone else had comments on it and, indeed - they have!