A new cult classic?


I personally thought this crazy kaleidoscopic film was wonderful, but many people seem to think the opposite. However I do think this film will become a cult classic much like the book in the not to distant future.

Check out my full review on my blog:
http://charlotteandcate.com/2016/03/24/delirious-high-rise-review/

reply

Any film that so badly wishes to become a cult classic probably won't become one.

reply

What makes you think this film WANTS to be a cult classic? That was never stated.

reply

By viewing it.

reply

The viewers decide whether a film becomes a cult classic not the film itself. Any Ballardian adaptation is at risk of becoming a cult due to the extremes themes and lack of plot

reply

Exactly. Hence why it's ridiculous and self-defeating to make a wannabe cult film, stealing from legit. cult films like A Clockwork Orange.

No one will be talking about High Rise in twenty years.

reply

I'm actually glad the film is generating this type of divisive reaction. It's exactly the type of film to do so.

reply

It is 40 years since the book was written and people are still talking about it. I had just finished re reading it when I heard about the film.

I can't be bothered with a signature

reply

[deleted]

I suspect that that will be a very small cult - I was so bored and uninterested in the characters that, after a hour, for the first time ever, I gave up on this and left the cinema.

reply

Amen. In every screening of this movie to date, the smartest beings present have been those who smelt dog $hit early and decided to hit the exit before the stench got out of hand. Unfortunately I wasn't one of those people.

reply

Completely agree, what a dud! Quite a few exited before I followed suit, after sitting through a tortuous hour. I rarely walk out and hope it doesn't happen again this year.

reply

Then I shall weep for humanity.


"In a time of universal deceit,
telling the truth is a revolutionary act."
George Orwell

reply

I wanted to like this movie but I didn't get it and I watched it twice! What made

the residents implode? Was it because of competition over who had the better party?

Or because of the utilities being disconnected? (I missed how that took place)

Can someone share their understanding of the movie for my questions please + thank you?!

reply

It was much more clear in the book. The breakdown went along class lines, pitting the residents on the lower floors against the ones on the upper ones.

reply

Yep. The rigid British class system caved in on itself and everyone was reduced to animals. No one won, and Ballard never made a point to show which viewpoint in his narrative was correct- he just observed them as Laing does in the film by the end. Like an impartial case study on humanity.

~~~~~
"This is my party. My guests. I should decide if someone gets lobotomized"

reply

ive never known a tower block hold middle class people upstairs and lower class downstairs, that's just ridiculous. The film however was.. dull

reply

Most of the typical movies considered cult classics tend to go down easy on repeated viewings. This is a bit tedious to get through one viewing.

reply

For me, the story gets boring after first hour. It could become a cult film, but it's a bit one-dimensional, so a minor one if so.

reply

Agreed. It hits you over the head too much with it's point without having any sort of engaging narrative to it after the beginning. It felt like the second half was just a series of montages about things falling apart.

reply

Possbly, but I suspect it will always be overshadowed by Snowpiercer.

TV: http://ihatemydvr.blogspot.com
LOST:http://eyemsick.blogspot.com

reply

I totally agree with you!

reply